APUSH Study Game!

<p>apush cram packet. google it.</p>

<p>yeah sorry unleashed…that was to be with wilmot proviso… i somehow copy pasted wrong</p>

<p>Can someone explain the roosevelt corrollary to the monroe doctrine? was there a big difference?</p>

<p>the Monroe doctrine stated that the United States would not allow further colonization in the western hemisphere, specifically in Latin America, and it asserted American independence in the realm of foreign policy. The Roosevelt corollary also involved Latin American. Many Latin American countries, notably Venezuela, had enormous debts to pay to Western Europe countries and Roosevelt (TR) feared there would be European intervention if Latin America didn’t get it’s “act” together. It gave the U.S. the ability to intervene in Latin American if anything were to happen also. The Roosevelt corollary was with TEDDY ROOSEVELT not FDR. FDR actually advocated the Good Neighbor Policy with Latin America, supporting non intervention in Latin American, which opposed the Roosevelt corollary.</p>

<p>can someone give a brief overview of immigration and opposition to immigration in the U.S. (nativists, know-nothings) and what time periods?</p>

<p>does anyone know the names of the justices that became liberal after the court-packing scheme under FDR. even though it didnt succeed, i know that some justices came to support him.</p>

<p>warren and burgen court?</p>

<p>What time period was the Burgen court? I know the Warren court (1950s?) was extremely liberal and had several controversial rulings regarding segregation and civil rights (Brown v. Board of Education).</p>

<p>don’t get confused, because there is the earl warren court (dwight eisenhower did not like earl warren at all - he wanted him to be conservative but was not) and then a Warren E. Burger court who was also liberal (Roe v. Wade) but not AS much as earl warren. burger was nominated by nixon</p>

<p>Thanks AKittka, </p>

<p>now can someone explain the difference between the Republicans and the Democrats? Ok, Im not stupid, I know “todays” reps and dems, Im talking about back in the day. Like early US history? and When did the roles change?</p>

<p>republicans emerged from whigs and northern democrats around 1856 to go against slavery in the territories, while democrats were around since the beginning and were originally pretty strict-constructionist, although soon their policies changed virtually every election. the parties somewhat flip-flopped in 1936, when blacks began voting for FDR, who was the first modern democrat. in the 1960s, the parties obtained the constituents they have today: democrats endorsed civil rights, while republicans favored segregation of blacks and whites.</p>

<p>what was the stimpson doctrine?</p>

<p>I’ll attempt this one. Political factions first emerged during the Constitutional Convention. The two factions were federalists and anti-federalists. Eventually, the anti-federalists become the National-Republicans with the emergence of Thomas Jefferson as a political figure opposed to Alexander Hamilton. These parties exist until the War of 1812, when the Federalist party becomes virtually extinct with the Hartford Convention. Up until Jackson’s presidency there is the “era of good feeling” where this limited political tension and the congress and presidency are held by the same party. Then Jackson emerges as a Democrat and a new party is founded to directly oppose him and this party is called the Whigs. It remains Whigs and Democrats until the eve of the Civil War when the Whigs become the Republican party and are directly opposed to the extension of slavery as advocated by Abraham Lincoln. After the Civil War, the Democrats are widely southerns who were once pro-slavery. Republicans get emancipated slaves’ vote. Then i guess it’s just democrats and republicans i.e. conservatives and liberals.</p>

<p>What do we need to know about civil war battles?</p>

<p>probably just the important battles like gettysburg (turning point), sherman and atlanta, the march to the sea which helped lincoln get reelected, vicksburg- mississippi and grant, and antietam</p>

<p>4 S’s of Civil War: sectionalism, state’s rights, slavery, and secession!</p>

<p>I’m pretty sure you don’t need to know military battles and strategies for the exam. From the three practice tests I have there isn’t one question about any specific battle, only outcomes and causes and maybe turning points i.e. Saratoga, Gettysburg.</p>

<p>stimson doctrine - kind of yelled at japan after they took over manchuria? i think?</p>

<p>um um um describe vertical integration, horizontal integration, trusts, pools, and interlocking directorates</p>

<p>Gettysburg: closest North the Confederate Army ever got. Vicksburg was a seige or something. I could care less about battles to be honest…</p>

<p>Vertical: company owns all competition
horizontal: companies all mesh to form 1
Trust: a big monopoly
Pool: when companies charge same rates to keep from competeing prices…</p>

<p>^the only thing i know in there is trusts. you sure they’ll get that economical?</p>

<p>trusts- big businesses + associated businesses that worked together to control the market. teddy roosevelt and taft worked to break up the “bad” trusts</p>