<p>oooh, “gifted” programs - now there’s a hot-button topic for you. Though I generally think our district uses common sense and efficiency in running programs, our gifted program is a mess (and of course it’s a “curriculum enrichment” program, not a"gifted" one).</p>
<p>Two anecdotes: when my oldest was in 2nd grade, 6 kids out of the 21 in her class were taken out of class twice a week for said program, The teacher (with whom my d did not gel) announced to the students that, because there were so many excellent students in the class, different kids would be chosen for the program the following marking period. My d somehow interpreted this to mean that everyone would have a chance to go, so I asked the teacher about this at our annual conference. The teacher hesitated (obviously didn’t want to burst my bubble) before telling me that she could only send 6 each marking period and that, not only would my d not be one of the second 6 to be chosen, she wouldn’t even be one of the third group of 6, if the teacher thought she had that many gifted students (and she didn’t). Math challenged I may be, but I could see that this meant she considered my d to be one of the 3 bottom students in the class.</p>
<p>Gulp. Wow. Imagine my relief when, the following year, my d scored a 150 on the district-wide IQ test and at the 99th percentile on the Iowas. After which she had no problem being selected for the “gifted” program, which turned out to be a ludicrous waste of time (as in, and I’m not kidding, assemble a portrait of a US president using fruits and vegetables). And the problem the 2nd grade teacher had with my d - well, she had terrible printing skills and kept making her Rs and Ss backwards.</p>
<p>Several years later, my middle d could not qualify for the gifted program despite stellar grades and plenty of evidence of creativity. Why not? Well, she scored 129 on the IQ test and the minimum for inclusion in the program was 130. Hm. Not only was the IQ test never identified as such to parents (went by its official name, and I wasn’t up on the lingo), but parents were also told that standardized testing wasn’t used for placement, when obviously it was. It was useless to point out to d that the program was a joke - she wanted to be one of the “smart” kids. She managed a 131 on the next test administration (lots and lots of testing in our district) and was admitted to the program, where she made some collages and built a popsicle stick bridge (in 7th grade … oh, well). Despite her marginal giftedness, she somehow graduated 1st in her class with a bunch of scholarships, including NMS, so she apparently learned how to ace standardized testing somewhere along the way.</p>
<p>Gifted education’s not my issue - I don’t object to it, but in our case the curriculum and instructors never justified the surrounding hoopla.</p>