Army Chief Is at a Loss...

<p>From the Los Angeles Times</p>

<p>Is U.S. Winning? Army Chief Is at a Loss
By Peter Spiegel, Times Staff Writer
July 15, 2006</p>

<p>WASHINGTON — It seemed like a routine question, one that military leaders involved in prosecuting the war in Iraq must ask themselves with some regularity: Is the U.S. winning?</p>

<p>But for Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker, the Army chief of staff known for his straight-shooting bluntness, it proved a hard one to answer.</p>

<p>During a Capitol Hill briefing for an audience mostly of congressional aides, Schoomaker paused for more than 10 seconds after he was asked the question — lips pursed and brow furrowed — before venturing: </p>

<p>“I think I would answer that by telling you I don’t think we’re losing.” </p>

<p>It was a small but telling window into the thinking of the Army’s top uniformed officer and one of the military’s most important commanders: Despite the progress being made by the new Iraqi government and the continuing improvement of local security forces, the outcome in Iraq, in many ways, is growing more uncertain by the day. </p>

<p>“The challenge … is becoming more complex, and it’s going to continue to be,” Schoomaker mused. “That’s why I’ll tell you I think we’re closer to the beginning than we are to the end of all this.” </p>

<p>Schoomaker’s candor is not unusual for a man who, by his own admission, was lured out of retirement to take the Army’s top job reluctantly. He has repeatedly told audiences that he was content in his Wyoming retirement when he got the call from Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld to return to active service.</p>

<p>It is a candor that appears to be contagious. The Army’s top commander in Iraq, Gen. George W. Casey Jr., acknowledged this week that the recent increase in sectarian violence in Baghdad might mean the U.S. has to increase the number of soldiers in the Iraqi capital — rather than the long-awaited decrease for which commanders had hoped.</p>

<p>For his part, Schoomaker was quick to note that his uncertainty did not mean that he was pessimistic. He noted that the creation of the new Iraqi government was an important achievement, although he cautioned that convincing Iraqis to use nonviolent, political means instead of guns and bombs to achieve their ends would be a “tough shift.” </p>

<p>“I think we are making significant progress; I think the challenges continue to come,” he concluded. “I do not believe that we are losing, but where I think we are on the scale of winning is very difficult, and time’s going to tell.”</p>

<p>Couldn’t resist a posting; these threads have been far too involved in Plebe matters as opposed to the political matters of earlier this year.</p>

<p>Interesting reply of Putin [Russia] in response to Bush’s admonition about democracy. Putin said he wasn’t sure he wanted democracy in Russia of a kind that is in Iraq. I can agree with him there.</p>

<p>Watching Biden on Meet the Press, who says he just completed his eight trip to Iraq [more than anybody on this thread I would guess] and said we simply are not winning in Iraq. He was commenting on the general unrest in the Middle East that, in part, our efforts in Iraq were supposed of mollify.</p>

<p>Newt Gingrich [a flaming liberal if ever there was one] is saying that we have simply backed ourselves into a corner where the US cannot do much of anything about the Earth’s political hotspots because of committments in Afgahanistan and Iraq.</p>

<p>Must be part of the liberal conspiracy to mis-report the news.</p>

<p>Reminds me of the movie Soylent Green. Keep feeding the masses what they desire [no abortion, 2nd Amendment, Flag-burninig, no gay marriage] and we [those in-charge] can keep doing whatever it is we think is best, regardless of whether it is in the country’s best interests.</p>

<p>Oh well, time to burn about $100 filling up the Excursion. My part in supporting the terrorists [or was that the war on terrorism. I get confused.]</p>

<p>Destabilizing the Middle East was part of the argument against attacking Iraq in the first place, and that prediction has come true and it seems to be gaining momentum. I can’t believe I’m in agreement with anything Newt has ever uttered…but he’s right about that. Take comfort in the fact that the North Koreans probably won’t waste any missiles on the Lone Star state…on the other hand, it makes me kind of nervous to sit on the beach in Southern California and watch the long parade of merchant vessels pulling into Long Beach and Los Angeles harbors…;)</p>