Art

<p>I need to do a comprehensive evaluation for an art class, and I was wondering if you guys had any suggestions for paintings I can evaluate.</p>

<p>Criteria:
-Made after 1865
-Uses landscape in a substantive way</p>

<p>I was thinking of doing it on Sidney Goodman’s “Figures in a Landscape,” but am unsure as to whether or not this fulfills the landscape criteria. </p>

<p>A link to it: <a href=“http://www.artchive.com/artchive/g/goodman/thumb/goodman_figures.jpg[/url]”>http://www.artchive.com/artchive/g/goodman/thumb/goodman_figures.jpg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Maybe something by Salvador Dali? His paintings always seem rather vast in scope, and they’re pretty much the most fun things to look at.</p>

<p>Salvador Dali painted? Un Chien Andalou? Same guy, no?</p>

<p>He definitely painted. (i.e. Persistence of Memory, Temptation of St. Anthony) And who’s Chien Andalou?</p>

<p>Oh! YEah, sorry deceptacon, yeah. He did do “chien andalou.” Good spot. :)</p>

<p>Haha, sorry if that was confusing. I didn’t know that he painted, but I just looked up some of his stuff! Pretty interesting. I’ll admit that I’ve never really ventured far from pop-art-ish prints (</p>