<p>I agree with everything emerald stated.</p>
<p>It is insane that a child can get ISS for giving an advil to another student.</p>
<p>Schools have lost sight of the big picture.</p>
<p>For example, dress code.
The school systems that my children attended (NC and VA) have strict dress codes.</p>
<ol>
<li>Girls cannot wear tank tops or have their back or stomach showing.<br></li>
</ol>
<p>I received a call from my DD that I needed to bring a top to school for her because she was sent to the office for inappropriate attire. I saw what she wore to school. A teacher saw her bending over into her locker and the shirt rode up exposing her back. She could not keep it tucked in and touch her toes. She could walk and sit with it tucked in, but that didn’t matter.</p>
<ol>
<li> Our DS got ISS in MAY 2 yrs ago, because the rule is you must wear a belt if the pants had belt loops. He forgot to put it on and as soon as he got to school they sent him to ISS until I brought a belt.</li>
</ol>
<p>Here’s the CRAZY back story. School calls me and says:
“Typically we give kids belts so they don’t get ISS, but we have lent all of them out and none of them have been returned.”</p>
<p>HMM, Let me get this right, because kids kept the belts, my child will get a zero? Why aren’t the kids you lent the belts to getting a zero for not returning them?</p>
<p>Second, the CLASSIC part…if the pants have no loops they cannot/will not enforce the belt loop. What did the kids who wanted to expose their underwear do, DAY ONE…CUT THE LOOPS! We followed with good faith the rule of the school and got penalized, the others who intentionally manipulated the rule got a free pass.</p>
<p>This is why I say schools need to use common sense. Those teachers in both scenarios had common sense, Bullet’s and my kids are A/B students in honors and APs, but yet a rule is a rule. I told the gc I will be there in 5 minutes for our DS and asked her to keep him in the office and not to send him to ISS…NOPE he had to go because that was the rule.</p>
<p>Now let me add the final wrinkle of this school (NUMBER 1 in the county academically). A child who was kicked off the buses because of poor behavior was placed on my children’s bus since his MOM was their driver. He thought it was funny to sexually finger girls as they walked past him to get on or off the bus. Did he get OSS or ISS even though parents complained? NO, his Mom was the bus driver and Union so his punishment after being kicked off of his “home” bus was to now place him on ours under his Mother’s supervision…am I the only one that sees the inequity…your child does it and you will be forced to drive them, the school would separate them from the students. The employee who has a child found guilty of “fingering” 14 yo girls on other buses is allowed to ride another bus because they believe that the parent can supervise them more closely while guaranteeing safety for all of the other children?</p>
<p>FWIW, he did finally lose all bus priviledges the last week of school because of me. He tried to to do that to our DD and unfortunately for him, her younger brother 6’2 220 lbs saw it and slapped his hand away. The driver was forced to stop because her DS tackled my DS in the aisle. She had to report the incident of both boys. The principal interviewed 10+ kids and again she was told this washer DS’s typical MO regarding riding the bus. </p>
<p>A yr later he was PERMANENTLY removed from riding school buses because he started it all over again in the Fall. His mother’s defense was “he was just messing around and it meant nothing”. </p>
<p>As for the are you alright aspect I agree, it is the wrong approach. Our DD would have allowed it to continue based on fear. It was the fact that the bus driver was going to have her brother penalized. She stood up because it was HER brother and he did what she hoped others would do…STAND UP AND PROTECT. Our DD is 5’1, and tiny, without her YOUNGER brother I fear it could have been much worse for her and the girls like her.</p>
<p>SAD…SAD…SAD that many parents refuse to see the writing on the wall that their own children are morally bankrupt.</p>