Avogadro's law

<p>Does anyone know a file I could download off the internet that has the number one, all the way to the number in avogadro’s law?</p>

<p>one question: why?</p>

<p>Create an Excel document and set it up to do it for you.</p>

<p>Im guessing you get an automatic “A” in the class or a ton of extra credit for doing this right? Be prepared to spend some cash on paper and ink.</p>

<p>You better hurry up because im sure your teacher will take it back and say you onlyget the grade or extra credit if you hand write it.</p>

<p>And we wonder why the rainforests are being destroyed?</p>

<p>My physics II teacher promised me an A for the semester if I was to do all the numbers starting at one. I’m going to see if it will fit a bunch of dvd disk.</p>

<p>How would I set up the excel thing to work for me?</p>

<p>Get a good printer and print it in very, very tiny print…</p>

<p>I’m not really worried about printing. I’m more worried about how im going to get the numbers.</p>

<p>you are crazy… lol it would take billions of years to do this</p>

<p>I highly doubt you would be able to find that anywhere, not even on the internet.</p>

<p>Is there any program that can list number’s non-stop. Something like seti@home where it uses up all your processing power to process there units. only this time im using that processing prower to process numbers. Any thing out there that can do it?</p>

<p>wait . . . all the numbers up to 6.02*10^23? I think that was just a way of saying you weren’t going to get an A. You’d never be able to do it.</p>

<p>Kinglin:
I strongly suspect your physics teacher was pulling your leg. Avogadro’s number is approximately 6.022 x 10^23. Forget about <em>printing</em> all these numbers on paper; even if you wrote a program in any higher_level language (C++, Pascal, …) to show these integers 1,2,…, ,6.022 x 10^23 on the screen, the sun would go nova long before you got close.
Think about it; even if you printed a million integers a second (or 10^6), it would take you about 6 x 10^(23-6) or 6 x 10^17 seconds to finish. How much is that in years? Works out to about 18 billion…</p>

<p>lol. kinglin, you’re stupid. you just got OWNED</p>

<p>Blah, I’ll use my cow’s. (cluster’s of workstations) And give it a try, see how long it would take 16 servers to process it :slight_smile: even just to see how high it gets.</p>

<p>18 billion / 6= 3 billion, have fun!</p>

<p>Find a roundabout or tricky way of doing it.</p>

<p>why don’t you just put more effort into the class? you’ll probably work less too to get the A.</p>

<p>Check back every thousand years or so and let us know how you are doing! :slight_smile: </p>

<p>Why not go from 1 to google?</p>

<p>no I have a better idea…why not go backwards from 1 to Planck’s constant?</p>

<p>been awhile since stats class, but wouldn’t your final number contain</p>

<p>~ 70x10^23 digits?</p>

<p>With standard font and margins you get around 3000 digits per page in a printoff.</p>

<p>Takes a hell of a lot of 3000’s to get to 70x10^23</p>