<p>You may have heard about the University of Michigan Law School’s recent announement that U of M undergrads who have at least a 3.8 GPA would not have to take the LSAT when applying to U of M Law School (though admittance would not be guaranteed).</p>
<p>In today’s Wall Street Journal online, the following quotes from the Dean of Admissions at the University of Michigan Law School, Sarah Zearfoss:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>As cited in the Wall Street Journal online, U of M Law School’s website says: </p>
<p>There are some interesting comments to the article. Many feel this is a complete aim at rankings. (gets rid of some potentially lowere LSAT scores)</p>
<p>bdm - I believe that the dean was referring to 200 in the junior class, rather than in the university as a whole, but I have to believe that she has good information straight from the source.</p>
<p>Right, but even per year, 200 is a tiny number. I’m sure she’s correct – it’s just astonishing. Out of 5,700 people per class, only 200 have a 3.8?</p>
<p>I don’t find it astonishing at all. Some colleges virtually give no A +'s. and for the very strong student who got an equal distribution of A and A-'s, their GPA would be in the 3.8 range.
As most kids go through 4 years of school and get a few grades below A-, their GPA is gonna be less than 3.8.</p>
<p>That’s why I have never been shy to suggest a kid take a few ( 2 or 3) on-line or winter session community college courses. For those kids who go to a school where getting a 3.8 is a true accomplishment, I think it is only fair to try to tweak their GPA a bit upward as they are competing with kids who go to school’s where an A/A + may be alot easier to obtain.</p>
<p>It may be a good tactic for U Mich. but my guess is that alot of UMich undergrads may prefer to get their JD from another school. 7 years in Ann Arbor might not be everyone’s cup of tea. As a 3.8 U Mich grad may be aiming for other T14 law schools, they probably take the LSAT anyway.</p>