<p>Citygirlsmom said: "As well, what is the big deal with the F WORD…its an adjective…wow…for us to be so freaked out in this day and age for someone to blurt out the F word…my goodness…</p>
<p>What is truely amazing about that word:</p>
<p>is a noun, a verb, an adjective, an adverb, a superlative, an insult, a compliment, a grunt…it is one of the most amazing english words when you think about it."</p>
<p>I wonder how she would feel if, out of frustration during a Presidential speach, GWB were to tell some heckling audience member to “shut the F-up”. I doubt she would be so understanding, nor wax poetic about what an “amazing” english word the F-word is. Often, it seems, the human reaction is to minimize the shocking or inappropriate behavior of someone of whom one approves, but to villify that same behavior from someone whom one dislikes. That’s why Matt Lauer gives the Columbia stage-troopers a pass, when chastizing Bab’s lone heckler. </p>
<p>Ok, maybe you could argue that the public use of such language would be entirely inappropriate under any circumstances coming for “the supposed leader of the free world”, but what about this scenario:</p>
<p>Suppose Toby Keith were to get on a political soap-box, (presenting a skit, perhaps) extolling the virtues of George W. Bush and his handling of “The War on Terrror”. Suppose someone who took exception to his departure from entertaining in order to push his political beliefs, were to heckle him to “shut up and sing”? Suppose Toby (a known conservative), were to tell that audience member to “shut the F-up”? Somehow, I doubt Matt Lauer would have suggested that the heckler should have taken an extended bathroom break. Somehow too, I doubt CGM would be asking, “what is the big deal?”. Political hypocrisy and double standards are intellectually and morally dishonest, no matter what side you happen to be on. The behavior is either excusable, or it’s not. Whether or not you agree with the political views of the person doing the behavior shouldn’t make any difference.</p>