<p>I’ve been admitted to the above colleges. Which one should I choose, considering future job prospects? Any suggestions are welcome :)</p>
<p>You can get a job from any of them, go to graduate school from any of them, etc. One is extremely rural, one is in the suburbs, one is in a very happening town, one is in the city.</p>
<p>Anything in particular you want to study?</p>
<p>you like your womens colleges</p>
<p>I’d say Barnard because it’s in the city and you must balance the school’s lack of males with a city with many males.</p>
<p>why “must” she balance her school’s lack of males? while many women at all-women’s colleges bemoan the lack of dating possibilities on campus, they choose to go to such a school because they know it’s best for them and they want to focus on their education… there’s no need to “balance” that with something else.</p>
<p>regardless, i agree with the barnard suggestion. barnard is like a happy combination of all three of the other schools, but even better.</p>
<p>Hamilton, esp. if you’re an english major.</p>
<p>what?! no way. barnard for english, hands down. i’m sure all those schools have excellent english programs but barnard’s is very highly reputed. and in the city you have so much access to poetry readings and book parties and literary history…</p>
<p>Hamilton is very good for writing.</p>
<p>I know that a lot of writers graduated from Barnard…probably the biggest reason I applied there (that, and NYC).</p>
<p>barnard or hamilton. by a landslide.</p>
<p>Smith hosts a major Poetry Center <a href=“http://www.smith.edu/poetrycenter/events.php[/url]”>http://www.smith.edu/poetrycenter/events.php</a>, and has a raft of famous writers among its alums, including Margaret Mitchell, Sylvia Plath, Jane Yolen, Madeleine L’Engle, Margaret Edson, Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, Yolanda King, Molly Ivins, Meg Greenfield, Anne Morrow Lindbergh, Laura Lazin, and Elizabeth Goldring.</p>
<p>It seems that Smith has a great quaint setting and class exchange possibilities within the 5-college system.</p>
<p>Smith or Hamilton.</p>
<p>Smith because you can take classes in the consortium, because it is a college town, it has a beautiful campus, an active student body, an amzaing alumni network, small classes, etc…including an excellent English department.</p>
<p>Hamilton because it developes graduates who can communicate no matter what the major. It also has a beautiful campus, but it is a bit more isolated.</p>
<p>Bryn Mawr</p>
<p>especially if you want to go into classics and/or archaeology</p>
<p>Barnard’s good, because not only is it an amazing school, but you can take every single one of your courses at the co-ed and Ivy League Columbia University. Plus, all Barnard undergrads get a Columbia degree. Barnard and Columbia are pretty much the same school, really.</p>
<p>Hamilton–amazing alumni network, first-rate writing program and top-notch scholars.</p>
<p>id go Hamilton</p>
<p>I’d say yes to Barnard. New York is fun, and people seem to be extremely happy at the school.</p>
<p>where is Hamilton?</p>
<p>Barnard- due to the association with Columbia, and the chance to be in New York City.</p>