When I think of schools like Nova, Lehigh and Bucknell, I think of party havens.
Just two years ago there was a list of top 50 party schools within 150 miles of Philly - alphabetically it was
Delaware
Lehigh
Penn
Rutgers
Temple
The top rated (by some) party school in the country is Tulane but I bet you’d think differently about it. Top 50 include U Dayton ( small classes), Penn, USC, Vanderbilt, UVA.
Kids party everywhere. When someone mentions Lehigh, Bucknell, and Nova to me, I think rich kid school. All three are well over half full pay - and Bucknell and Nova overwhelmingly white. Lehigh mostly.
We all, including me, have preconceived notions. I think all three are great. But I do think big money kids are attracted to them - and Tulane and Syracuse and others on the list
You can look at each’s common data set to see class size by range. Section I3
At Lehigh 10% are 50+. At Nova it is far less.
You don’t know about major classes anywhere. My kid went to a 9k regional public, her classes ranged 5-35 based on what she told me. So I’m guessing a small school - a Millersville or TCNJ will look different than Rutgers or PSU.
I know in my life, with an MBA desired for hire, I’ve worked for a U of Phoenix, we had a Vandy MBA working for a W Georgia undergrad and until recently, a Harvard Law working for Fairleigh Dickinson undergrad.
You may be right. We all think differently. But life isn’t black and white like you seem to think.
I will say mine who chose a regional public over top 20 LAC had an incredible education with mentors, dinners with faculty, study abroad included and more. But she was part of a special honors cohort. They’re out there too if you go to a school where you stand out. So you might look for those - Honors type programs or living learning communities, even at smaller schools.
You have left out a few things - unweighted gpa and rigor. What level of classes has she taken in English, math, social science and foreign language?
One concern - just from observation - it seems like in some ways you are running the search and deciding things vs her. Example - you recommended accounting because it will be less limiting. I get it -my kids double with Poli Sci and intl studies scared me but she landed - phew. But I wonder if an LAC will be better for her - where she can explore more freely. What if you find out she loves sociology ? Some schools have business and merit aid - but maybe not accounting. Or others might be easier admits - so a Nova without the heft or price tag.. Marist as an example.
LAC - look at Dickinson as an example of a school that doesn’t offer accounting but business if you choose. Wheaton is Mass is another - without a big sticker
Susquehanna offers accounting, has big merit and you won’t be locked in. Same with Furman, a great name. For religious, how about St Bonaventure, Siena, Manhattan, Scranton, Muhlenberg, Xavier, or Gordon.
Just some things to noodle on.
I appreciate you have established thoughts, right or wrong. We all do. We all think differently but I think your risk reward is spot on - if you spend more, it’s for perceived experience and not outcome.
Schools like Nova, Richmond and Bucknell do well in salary surveys to having large programs in business and engineering. Just a few days ago, the Wall Street Journal put out its top schools. In between #1 Stanford and #3 Yale was Babson. Yep #2 - because all its majors are high paid. Bentley is another and even Bryant in Rhode Island, so you have to take those studies for what they are. PSU is a leader in meteorology as an example - not a high paid field and will have every humanity and social science known to man. So you’re not comparing apples to apples.
But Smeal vs Nova - Smeal (PSU B school) will stand toe to toe. Both great schools.
Good luck.