<p>Chemistry is a common major. Interesting choices if cost is not a factor.
My oldest applied to U of O for biology, it is a good school.
Don’t know anything about the others.</p>
<p>MickJag, what do you mean by “best social scene”? Greeks, rah-rah athletics, school spirit, parties?</p>
<p>“Chemistry” is a broad field: analytical, organic, bioorganic, materials, nanotech, etc. To be employable and competitive for jobs in chemistry with just a B.S., your friend would need to get his hands dirty in a lab doing undergrad research. Take a look at the chem. departments websites and see how many opportunities there are for undergrads to be involved in that. I know that Oregon does offer opportunities for undergraduate chemistry research, and its chemistry department is well-regarded. And if you looking for rah-rah spirit, you can’t beat the Oregon Ducks.
[Chemistry</a> Degree, Organic Chemistry Major - University of Oregon Major](<a href=“http://admissions.uoregon.edu/majors/chemistry/interior2.html#hands]Chemistry”>http://admissions.uoregon.edu/majors/chemistry/interior2.html#hands)</p>
<p>Of the schools where your friend is intending to apply, in my opinion the University of Arizona would be the best choice for someone who would like to gain research experience as an undergrad and who doesn’t mind the heat or the relatively large size. </p>
<p>If you look for “Academic R&D Expenditures” on the National Science Foundation website, and then look at the rankings of total research expenditures in chemistry specifically, you will find the University of Arizona ranked 41 in 2004, 33 in 2005, and 29 in 2006 (the last year for which the data are currently available). The rising trend usually points to a department that’s “on the move,” and I know of some very interesting work being conducted there. </p>
<p>UC Riverside ranked 89 in 2004, 85 in 2005, and 90 in 2006. The University of Oregon was 94 in 2004 and (as far as I could tell), not in the top hundred in 2005 or 2006–but that surprised me, because they have a strong department, in my opinion. San Diego State and Sonoma didn’t seem to be in top hundred in any of the years.</p>
<p>Of course, research expenditure is not a guarantee of excellence in undergraduate teaching! And your friend might have other specific reasons for selecting a different college. In my field (broadly speaking), there is a faculty member at Berkeley who is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, and who attended the University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire as an undergraduate–because his girlfriend was going there. </p>
<p>But, other things being equal, I’d pick the University of Arizona.</p>
<p>I agree with Quantmech. Arizona has the best program in chemistry and you would probably have the best opportunity there to do high-level research. I met people who went there who got into top 10 programs with mediocre GRE scores. I think UC-Riverside would also be a good option because it might be easier to go to a different UC for grad school in chemistry (and the other UC schools are generally high ranking in chemistry.)</p>
<p>People in this thread are talking about how great Arizona is but why aren’t they even ranked for undergraduate chemistry research. Research in this field is extremely important.</p>
<p>Does anyone know how the science facilities are UC Riverside and Oregon?</p>
<p>“People in this thread are talking about how great Arizona is but why aren’t they even ranked for undergraduate chemistry research. Research in this field is extremely important”</p>
<p>I’m not sure what you mean by “undergraduate chemistry research.” If you want to know about how good the research opportunities are, then just look at the grad school rankings. There are no rankings for research on undergraduate chemistry education. Rankings in undergraduate chemistry programs have nothing to do with research in education. (If there was, U. of Wisconsin would be #1 as it is the place where the Journal of Chemical Education is published.) The only difference in graduate vs. undergraduate rankings in chemistry is probably the quality of the student body. I don’t know why Arizona wouldn’t be ranked in the Gourman Report.</p>
<p>I don’t know its ranking in every subfield, but I do know Arizona a top 10 school in analytical chemistry. Graduate rankings will tell you the quality of the faculty (at least in terms of their research,) how cutting edge the research you might do as an undergrad, the quality of the facilities, and also how much pull recs will have for grad school (because the faculty members are respected.) There might be a loose correlation to rigor in the classroom, but this is probably more closely tied to the intelligence of the student body.</p>
<p>The Undergraduate origins of the students who recieve a PHd in chemistry by percentage of students.
Harvey Mudd
Reed<br>
Cal Tech
Wabash
Carleton
Grinnell
College of Wooster
Kalamazoo
Texas Lutheran
Bowdoin</p>
<p>An eminent chemical physicist I know sent his chem major son to Macalester, another went to Carleton.
You also might check NSF fellowships awarded.</p>
<p>I would say that Pacific Luthern University in Tacoma WA has one of the best chemistry departments I know of. They have graduates which go on to do research in major univeristies including John Hopkins, University of Washington, etc. Try calling the chemistry chair there and talking with him. They have a lot of great equipment and give a lot of one-on-one care to the students in general.</p>