<p>T26E4: I meant that if you’re brilliant, you have a shot at a merit-based scholarship. If you’re poor, you’ll get financial aid. If you’re wealthy and you can get in ED, then you’re fine. If you can barely get in ED and non of the above three apply, you’re left out. Someone on here mentioned what this sort of predicament is called–the barbell effect. Colleges hike up the cost and give generous financial aid, leaving those you don’t qualify for financial aid facing 58,000 a year. </p>
<p>My dad grew up extremely poor and has been working his whole life so me and my brothers will have “a better education and better opportunities” than he did. He isn’t around much because he’s working all the time, so now I wonder if being successful is really an advantage for my education and opportunities. Vacations are really the only time I get to spend with him. He’s always traveling and working, and I’m really starting to crack down on academcis (since junior year, actually). I’d estimate my dad’s income is around 350-450 a year. I have two brothers in college, 25,000 each a year. He pays my mom 35,000 a year for me and my other brother. He also pays for my grandparent’s apartment rent, living costs, and medical fees, which are very high because of my grandfather’s fragile condition. They live in Germany and the taxes are outrageous there. My stepmom is just now recovering from skin cancer, and those medical bills are also pretty high. On top of all that, he bought this house in a good school district so we wouldn’t have to pay private school tuition, again for my education and opportunities. On top of all that, he’s in the highest taxable income bracket, so he shells out around 30% a year to the government. So that 400k income doesn’t look that high when you take all the factors into consideration. Apparently they do take these into account on the FAFSA and the financial aid calculators, and we still get 0 in aid. That’s why I’m not sure how financial aid programs make sense.</p>
<p>Zephyr: Thanks for the insight. The kids who have gone to Cornell in the past few years have all been valedictorians; however, most of the top ranked kids at my school, Highland Park, usually go to Vanderbilt or Duke or UVA. I think they’re capable at HYP or MIT, they’re just usually more conservative and prefer Southern college life. Highland Park is technically a public school, but you really shouldn’t treat it like one. HP is comparable to most top private schools. Actually, I just looked some facts up: HP ranked 15th on Newsweek’s list of top high schools in the U.S. HP is 99% white. Jeff Barrows, a physics teacher quoted in The Daily Campus, said that the students “aren’t the first in their families. There is a precedent that precedes them in terms of academic stature. They’re nurtured that way at home. They are inquisitive because they have been asked to be that way outside of the classroom.” Not sure why he said “precedent that precedes,” but he wasn’t that good of a teacher anyway! Some of the kids here are absolutely crazy about getting college admissions.</p>
<p>I went to Memorial High School in Houston for two years, which is pretty comparable to HP. They have a much better tennis team, and that’s when I went to the state championship. Neither seem like public schools, and I think Southern colleges know this and consider it.</p>
<p>So, considering my upward trend and the school I go to, would anything change?</p>