<p>TOP PRODUCERS OF FULBRIGHT AWARDS FOR AMERICAN STUDENTS, BY TYPE OF INSTITUTION, 2005-6
Bachelor’s institutions Number of awards Number of applicants</p>
<p>Smith College 14 31
Claremont McKenna College 9 18
Wellesley College 9 30
Hamilton College 8 22
Pitzer College 8 24
College of the Holy Cross 6 15
Grinnell College 6 12
Kenyon College 6 14
Mount Holyoke College 6 16
Pomona College 6 35
Reed College 6 10
Vassar College 6 19
Wesleyan U. 6 17
Wheaton College (Mass.) 6 15
Bowdoin College 5 16
Macalester College 5 8
St. Olaf College 5 13
U. of Puget Sound 5 14
Carleton College 4 7
Earlham College 4 6
New College of Florida 4 6
Occidental College 4 8
Swarthmore College 4 26
U. of Dallas 4 10
Whitman College 4 15
Bryn Mawr College 3 7
Colby College 3 7
Juniata College 3 5
Oberlin College 3 20
Washington and Lee U. 3 9
Williams College 3 13</p>
<p>This is actually the 3rd year in the row that Smith has been in the top 5, and has the largest number over that period.</p>
<p>What isn’t shown here are the comparisons with the Ivies, etc. Fulbrights are awarded to graduate students as well as undergrads. Subtract the graduate student awards, and compare for student population, Smith far outperforms every single one of the Ivies (UMichigan actually had the largest total number, at 26, but for a student population of around 30,000.)</p>
<p>The reason, I think, has nothing to do with the quality of the student body per se - no one would argue that the Smith student body is so much superior to Amherst’s, Williams’, Swarthmore’s, Princeton’s, etc. Rather, it has to do with the quality of advising. I continue to be amazed, even awed, by the advising my d. has been able to access, and she has grown mightily as a result. Apparently, she isn’t the only one.</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.smith.edu/news/2005-06/TopFulbrights.html[/url]”>http://www.smith.edu/news/2005-06/TopFulbrights.html</a></p>
<p>Now if I could only learn the Smith “fight song”…;)</p>