<p>By all accounts Ted Kaczynski is a pretty bright guy, too. I’m almost positive that raw intelligence and effectiveness as a leader are only loosely correlated.</p>
<p>“Hey give Hill credit this week she went on Fox for the first time in 10 years! Wonder Why ?”</p>
<p>Actually, I believe she was on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace a month or two ago … the day where she made a marathon appearance on every Sunday morning talk show and didn’t answer any question which she didn’t feel like answering.</p>
<p>It’s Edwards and Obama who are too afraid to appear on Fox.</p>
<p>I almost fell off my chair laughing when I read this comment which was posted in response to the CNN article about Bill Clinton referring to Hillary as a world class genius.</p>
<p>“Meanwhile, Michelle Obama complained that Obama is lazy, dirty and snoring at home. What a contrast!”</p>
<p>Well FundingFather a fact that even a “denier” like you can’t deny is that Fox News is a mouthpiece for the Republican Party. It would make no sense for a Democrat to seek coverage on Fox News.</p>
<p>" It would make no sense for a Democrat to seek coverage on Fox News."</p>
<p>So why would republicans participate in debates on CNN or seek coverage on shows like “Hardball?” Is it because republicans have the courage and ability to deal with hostile environments whereas the democrats are a bunch of wussies?</p>
<p>“It would make no sense for a Democrat to seek coverage on Fox News.”</p>
<p>They had no trouble with appearing on Fox News or planning to have debates on Fox until the far left crazies of KOS and MoveOn stamped there feet and Obama and Edwards sprang to attention, saluted and marched off to carry out their orders lest their candidacies suffer the same attacks that Joe Lieberman’s did. The difference is that Lieberman has a backbone. Edwards and Obama are terrified of the far left.</p>
<p>CNN planted Democrat operatives in the recent Republican debate to ask questions. CNN suggested they were just plain regular folks. Liberals dismissed this obvious example of liberal bias by CNN but go crazy because FOX news has conservative guests along with liberal guests. CNN is better now than it was when Ted Turner owned it, but it still has employs far too many liberals claiming to be unbiased. FOX news commendators don’t hid whether they are liberal or conservative, or somewhere in between. CNN should follow that example. </p>
<p>Maybe every husband does not think his wife is a genius, but he should try to belive she is a geniue, tell her she is a genius, and never miss a chance to tell the media she is a genius. And if that does not work, mafool’s method should be adopted. I have no problem with family bias.</p>
<p>The bias that goes on in Fox News is uncomparable. Hannity and Hume and O’Reilly outright endorse the Republican Party. Watch “OUTFOXED-Rupert Murdoch’s War on Journalism”</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>The man in question isn’t paid by any Democratic campaign and clearly stated he was undecided. Republicans were just mad about the question because they can’t face the facts about gays in the military.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Joe Liebermann isn’t any kind of Democrat and deserves every attack he gets. He even endorsed a Republican for President, are you kidding? I am sure you would offer the same ringing endorsement to a Republican who endorsed a Democrat for President :)</p>
<p>"The bias that goes on in Fox News is uncomparable. Hannity and Hume and O’Reilly outright endorse the Republican Party. Watch “OUTFOXED-Rupert Murdoch’s War on Journalism”</p>
<p>Oh you are priceless! If you didn’t exist, we’d have to make you up.</p>
I guess that makes Gen. Kerr a lier too? He was a CNN plant and anyone smart enough to do a Google search could have discovered his bias. Please don’t tell me you actually think CNN didn’t know of this guy’s background.</p>
Well, I guess we know now where you get your misinformation from. I suppose you believe Fahrenheit 911 presented the truth as well. The irony is priceless … use something like OUTFOXED as proof of bias.</p>
<p>
It used to be that Lieberman’s positions were the heart and sole of the Democratic party. Of course over the last 30 - 40 years they have abandoned national security as a serious platform leaving Lieberman all by himself. By today’s definition of the Democratic Party, JFK would not even be a Democrat.</p>