<p>I have studied Barron’s and PR’s review book, and now I’m wondering if I should run through the McGraw-Hill prep book too? Is that too much? Does PR (I used it as my main prep book) and Barron cover enough for the Bio SAT II??? (I want to take E) Please help. I feel the biggest challenge when facing a bio test is knowing where and to what extent you will be tested, and cb doesn’t give a lot of clues!</p>
<p>Sorry if this is a dumb question, I’m international and my bio course was different.</p>
<p>PR is generally good in covering all the content, though in some places it may not be in-depth enough. It probably gives the “bare minimum” for an 800. </p>
<p>Barrons goes way overboard usually, though I don’t have experience with their Bio SAT 2 book.</p>
<p>I think you’ve got enough content covered, don’t waste any time. I skimmed through McGraw-Hill and I thought the layout was confusing and too paragraph-oriented (rather than short paragraphs or concise bullet point lists that you can actually memorize). So I would just recommend doing as many practice tests as you can from multiple books, provided that you have a lot of time. If you don’t have a lot of time, just make sure you have PR and Barron’s info memorized. Good luck!</p>