<p>I was Googling on something else and came across this article in *Time *magazine online: [Gunning</a> for Sergeant York - TIME](<a href=“http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1050466,00.html?iid=sphere-inline-bottom]Gunning”>http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1050466,00.html?iid=sphere-inline-bottom). It’s about the alleged poor performance of the Army’s DIVAD anti-aircraft gun system, and is datelined April, 2005. I’m not much of a *Time *fan, but even they should not be writing stories in 2005 about the test results of a weapons system that was canceled by the Reagan administration twenty years earlier: [M247</a> Sergeant York - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia](<a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M247_Sergeant_York]M247”>M247 Sergeant York - Wikipedia).</p>
<p>I doubt this means anything other than a lack of thorough editing of their archives, but it was fairly strange.</p>