Black U.S. AIDS rates rival some African nations

tega · July 29, 2008, 2:44pm

[Report:</a> Black U.S. AIDS rates rival some African nations - CNN.com](<a href=“http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/conditions/07/29/black.aids.report/index.html]Report:”>Report: Black U.S. AIDS rates rival some African nations - CNN.com)

Volunteer at your local HIV outreach center, somewhere out there a very confused kid need your help.

barrons · July 29, 2008, 3:07pm

They think it’s a government plot to steal their vital bodily fluids. Not a disease spread by sex/blood contact.

razorsharp · July 29, 2008, 3:18pm

Rev. Wright was right all along. AIDS is a government plot to kill black people. Everyone knows that!

BCEagle91 · July 30, 2008, 2:11am

I think I posted an article snippet on the AIDs epidemic in the South. This was at a time when a bill cosponsored by McCain and Obama was making the news on aid for Africa. Why aid for Africa but not for the US?

GA2012MOM · July 30, 2008, 2:51am

The biggest thing that we need to teach young girls/women that “/clinton sex” is NOT safe sex.

Girls need to know that HIV/AIDS can be transmitted that way also!

iloveagoodbrew · July 30, 2008, 1:03pm

Higher risk population = higher incidents, how is this so surprising?? Guess what, heavy drug users have higher cases of transmitted diseases, and whores have higher rates of STDs…

AMom2 · July 30, 2008, 1:22pm

Condoms prevent HIV/AIDS! 99% of the US populations should know that by now with all the ads and info distributed in the schools.

ellemenope · July 30, 2008, 1:35pm

I hadn’t realized that the incidence in the Af-Am population was so high! It doesn’t get a lot of press.

zoosermom · July 30, 2008, 1:40pm

There’s a lot of outreach here to help men and women understand that being “on the down low” is a major cause of the spread of AIDS and that, of course, condom usage is crucial. Some success, but not as much as one would hope, because for cultural reasons, the concept of men in heterosexual relationships while engaging in homosexual behavior is not often admitted.

emeraldkity4 · July 30, 2008, 1:43pm

Condoms prevent HIV/AIDS! 99% of the US populations should know that by now with all the ads and info distributed in the schools.

Well we don’t really have accurate sex ed in many schools.

The current federal administration, cut off sex education funding for my state ( Washington) because our state legislature requires the curriculum to be medically accurate.
Imagine!
[State</a> loses federal sex education funding](<a href=“http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/344701_education24.html]State”>http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/344701_education24.html)

Schools don’t have to teach sex ed, I don’t think it is required by NCLB & there are many misconceptions still about sexually transmitted diseases, especially HIV.

Like… it is a " gay disease".
[url=<a href=“http://www.avert.org/statsum.htm]United”>Get the facts about sexual health and HIV | Be in the KNOW]United</a> States HIV & AIDS statistics summary<a href=“the%20survival%20rate%20is%20increasing%20,%20which%20contributes%20to%20increase%20in%20population”>/url</a>

My own Dr. many years ago, when I asked about my daughter being tested ( she had received multiple transfusions in 1982- it appeared in US in 1981, testing of blood wasn’t required ) told me that it wasn’t necessary, until she was sexually active- perhaps 7 or 8 years in the future. ( she was 6 at the time)
I switched Drs. & had to take her to Public Health for anonymous testing.

AMom2 · July 30, 2008, 2:14pm

HIV/AIDS was taught in the biology and health classes not sex education class. It should be included in every high school biology class along with information about other diseases.

The information has also been in television public service announcements.

emeraldkity4 · July 30, 2008, 2:30pm

Whether education about sexual health including diseases that are transmitted by body fluid is available in health classes, in biology classes or in a class termed " sex ed" it needs to be accurate & effective.

Unfortunately, some states may not have that consideration.

[Texas</a> keeps a tight lid on sex ed](<a href=“http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/07/14/0714abstinenceclass.html]Texas”>http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/07/14/0714abstinenceclass.html)

As in all public schools in Texas, Austin district teachers are forbidden to hand out condoms, and the district does not allow instruction on proper use. The state requires that information about condoms be given “in terms of human use reality rates” — an estimate that condoms are effective, on average, only 85 percent of the time, with failures usually due to improper handling or inconsistent use.

That’s in contrast to some schools in California, where teachers can demonstrate how to wear condoms by rolling them onto bananas. And in Portland, Maine, school board members approved a measure last year that allows middle school students, who range from 11 to 15 years old, to get birth control prescriptions from the school’s health center.

Twenty years ago, Texas teachers had more freedom to talk about condoms and birth control methods as part of health courses that covered a broad range of sexual, reproductive and family issues. That is now considered “comprehensive” sex education. With few exceptions, it is a thing of the past in Texas public schools.

[Texas</a> keeps a tight lid on sex ed](<a href=“http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/07/14/0714abstinenceclass.html]Texas”>http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/07/14/0714abstinenceclass.html)

AMom2 · July 30, 2008, 2:37pm

I live in Texas and they teach it in Biology and Health classes. Some people prefer to not use condoms.

Black U.S. AIDS rates rival some African nations

CONNECT WITH US