Bonus Pay for Popular Profs?

<p>According to yesterday’s Chronicle of Higher Education, faculty at Texas A&M are eligible to receive bonuses based on positive student feedback. Is this a great idea (after all, shouldn’t top teachers be rewarded?) or will it simply lead to lighter workloads and/or grade inflation?</p>

<p>Here’s a link to the entire article, [The</a> Chronicle of Higher Education](<a href=“http://chronicle.com/daily/2009/01/9784n.htm?utm_source=pm&utm_medium=en]The”>http://chronicle.com/daily/2009/01/9784n.htm?utm_source=pm&utm_medium=en) but it’s a subscription-only publication, so I’ve pasted an excerpt below. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

Seems to me this is only one of the two prime questions … this questions presumes the profs will change their grades to get high marks from their students (fair enough). But what about profs who already give high grades … i’d bet they also get higher than average marks from their students. If this is going to be based on a metric something like … student survey score / average grade in class … would be a much fairer metric. I’m guessing there is a correlation between grades and evaluation scores … and the real trick is being tough and highly rated in an evaluation.</p>

<p>Another issue is that some classes or departments (and thus, teachers) differ largely in popularity.</p>

<p>For example, the introductory psychology class at my school, like at many, is huge. The teacher for this class is good, but there are other professors who are just as good that probably do not get nearly as much positive feedback, simply due to numbers.</p>

<p>The popular professors at my undergrad school weren’t very good. They graded easy but they were awful in actually teaching it so you can retain the information.</p>

<p>Exactly, I agree with GoldShadow’s point. As the course material becomes more complex (junior and senior level classes), the class size also usually decreases. Besides, I know a lot of students that hold grudges against professors just because they received a bad grade. About half of my general chemistry class fails the course, I somehow doubt that most of the D or F students wrote our professor a great evaluation even though he really was good at teaching the material. </p>

<p>In theory it seems like a nice idea to recognize teachers who put in the extra effort to connect better to their students, but I’m just not sure how it would work in practice.</p>

<p>The practice strikes me as absurd because it adds nothing. That is, how popular a prof is with his students has no financial impact on the institution. And given that they are likely to stay with the same university permanently once they are started somewhere on the tenure track, the schools don’t need to be all that competitive to retain them. So it seems like extra money being spent without cause. It would be better to pool the potential bonus funds to pick up some additional star faculty whose presence might have a more tangible impact.</p>

<p>I know here at Caltech the winner of the Feynman Award, given each year for the best teaching, grants the recipient a permanent $3000 a year raise. That’s not a bad incentive to teach well…but it certainly hasn’t led to easier grading, lighter workloads, or, well, any better teaching.</p>

<p>Also, I remember one of my older professors talking about a practice they had in the early 1900s in Europe where a professor wouldn’t be paid by the university. Instead, he would offer classes and his salary was directly linked by how many students enrolled in the class (which one would imagine would be correlated rather heavily to the quality of their instruction). So, yeah, the idea of linking professor pay to teaching quality isn’t really new.</p>

<p>sugar_sweet…Some instructors/professors teach all levels of classes. Actually that is something I look for when I sign up for a class. Do they only instruct high level classes or do they also instruct 101 classes? My experience so far has been this. In General Psyc our instructor also instructed higher levels of Psyc classes. He was a really good instructor…He just loved Psyc in general. An English teacher I had for English 102 also instructed other levels of English classes. She was very nice and very teachable. I had a Elementary Algebra instructor who only instructed in that level of Math. She was horrible at explaining algebra. She seemed distant from the class, like she didn’t even want to be instructing the class. </p>

<p>I think it would be great if they gave bonuses for instructors that were graded well. Of course, if the school saw the past two semesters of grades and they were an average of C and then one semester they were all A’s and they had been graded really good by students, of course they are going to know that they graded higher to get that good rating.</p>