Boston school bus drivers stage surprise strike, disrupting service to 33,000 student

<p>

<p>I would fire every last one of the drivers.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I bet the union contract does not allow for that.</p>

<p>The union contract may not allow for striking, either.</p>

<p>Sounds like it was prompted by the vendor withholding paychecks, amongst other things resulting in a lockout.
But there must be a better way to negotiate.</p>

<p>“But there must be a better way to negotiate.”</p>

<p>Perhaps they should look to our Federal government for tips on negotiating!</p>

<p>Oddly (to me), the drivers are in the Steelworkers’ Union, which has said they should go back to work because the strike violates the collective bargaining agreement. </p>

<p>This is the kind of weird situation workers get stuck in. They don’t actually work for the city. They work for some contractor. This one is a company called Veolia Corporation. They’ve apparently been changing rules, etc. and anger has been rising. In the normal course, there would either be negotiations or a strike but this is that situation where buses have been “privatized”. It may be the company is using the quasi-public relationship of workers to city to not negotiate. I have no idea. </p>

<p>The city is insisting the drivers work tomorrow. I suspect most will.</p>

<p>Firing everyone is a massive over-reaction. This isn’t air control. And Reagan gave Patco time to respond.</p>

<p>Teacher strikes seldom occur in Massachusetts, as they are illegal. If the bus drivers don’t work for the school dept., situation may be murky</p>

<p>If our very-well-taken-care-of congress can effectively go on strike, why can’t a bunch of blue collar bus drivers?</p>

<p>They were back at work today. The union got what it wanted: a meeting to discuss grievances.</p>