Brilliant political video

Parent Cafe
1

<p><a href=“http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1qG6m9SnWI[/url]”>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1qG6m9SnWI&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

2

<p>Watch NYMom’s and then watch this; :)</p>

<p><a href=“http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AE847UXu3Q[/url]”>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AE847UXu3Q&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

3

<p>It’s not as though other candidates (even macho Texan Republicans!) don’t get dolled up for interviews. Hell, I bet even Cheney would, if he had hair.</p>

4

<p>Wow NYMom - that’s pretty powerful. My d tells me Edwards is absolutely ‘worshiped’ in Chapel Hill (where his headquarters are located).</p>

<p>And Motherdear…I have to admit I chuckled…lol! </p>

<p>My d had a whole stash of funny Bush and Cheney stuff…I’ll have to see if any of it is ‘presentable’. George W. would even like most of it…he has a good sense of humor (as does Edwards it seems…lol!)</p>

5

<p>Great video, NYMom. I love it! I also love the fact that Edwards campaign made a bundle of money off of the ridiculous comments of that scum, Coulter. Very smart.</p>

6

<p>What IS Ann Coulter’s problem? Surely she doesn’t think she is helping her cause? I think people like her, on both sides of the aisle, don’t really care about their party or their politics…they just know they more they act like jerks, the fatter their bank accounts get.</p>

7

<p>ldmom: I really think people should stop having her on TV shows and stop publishing her comments and books. I just think she’s pure trash-- truly a disgrace and an embarrassment. More importantly, she just comes across as amazingly ignorant and dumb (except that the dumber she sounds, the more money she makes-- it would appear).</p>

8

<p>yeah jack…that dumb/jerk act is actually quite smart, or should I say, greedy of her. She is completely devoid of self-respect apparently.</p>

9

<p>The couple of times I’ve watched Ann Coulter, she was constantly fiddling with her hair. I’ll bet she spends mucho moola on it.</p>

10

<p>ah well there ya go marite. She ‘needs’ the money…hehe! I have to laugh at this regarding the controversial Time magazine cover…</p>

<p>Ann Coulter distorted…
<a href=“http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20050425,00.html[/url]”>http://www.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,20050425,00.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Ann Coulter not distorted…
<a href=“http://feedlot.blogspot.com/2005/04/time-mag-not-ann-coulter-distorted.html[/url]”>http://feedlot.blogspot.com/2005/04/time-mag-not-ann-coulter-distorted.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>Of course, the Plains Feeder thinks Time Magazine is the distorted party, but I just think they were trying to help her out…lol</p>

11

<p>Here are two good ones:</p>

<p><a href=“http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3082046974685125353&q=bush+comedian+impersonator&total=71&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0[/url]”>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3082046974685125353&q=bush+comedian+impersonator&total=71&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p><a href=“http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2498726231202974313&q=bush+nephew&total=27&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1[/url]”>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2498726231202974313&q=bush+nephew&total=27&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

12

<p>those were hilarious BedHead. Please tell me that wasn’t really George W’s nephew though. </p>

<p>They’d better trot out George P and leave that one home.</p>

13

<p>Pierce Bush = George W.'s nephew in real life. The funny thing about it is he’s the one who looks most like W.</p>

14

<p>good grief…rofl!</p>

15

<p>I actually think George P has potential…but look at the comments here by Pierce Bush. I think he is using his ‘inside words’…lol! Figures he’s Neil’s son. Oh well…it is an old article, maybe he was still on his way to being cool…:wink: </p>

<p><a href=“http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/08/03/bush.young/georgep2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/08/03/bush.young/&h=168&w=220&sz=9&hl=en&start=5&tbnid=0-O1PjRbtf_keM:&tbnh=82&tbnw=107&prev=/images%3Fq%3DGeorge%2BP%2BBush%26gbv%3D2%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG[/url]”>http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/08/03/bush.young/georgep2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/08/03/bush.young/&h=168&w=220&sz=9&hl=en&start=5&tbnid=0-O1PjRbtf_keM:&tbnh=82&tbnw=107&prev=/images%3Fq%3DGeorge%2BP%2BBush%26gbv%3D2%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

16

<p>Hilarious, bedhead! I’ve seen the comedian before - it’s astounding how he can “become” Bush or Clinton even though he looks nothing like either of them.</p>

17

<p>

</p>

<p>Idmom: I am not trying to be snide. I am just curious: do you think George P has potential because Bush isn’t such a dirty word in Texas itself? 'Cause in the country as a whole, I think any George Bush pretty much has a name that’s mud, considering the fact that he went from the highest approval ratings of all time (post 9/11 really helped him, even though it emboldened him to undertake his largest goof, the Iraq War) for any president, to being tied with the lowest of all time. I wonder if Texans have a different perspective.</p>

18

<p>Of course we have a different perspective…it’s Texas! :wink: All things look different from here. JK! </p>

<p>I don’t think George P is going to have hard time with the Bush moniker…especially in 15 years or so after we have had a few Democratic Presidents. And remember this…George W. may be mud…but the Democratic-controlled Congress has a lower approval rating than him. (Which is just pathetic that we are in this predicament btw…) He is already extremely popular with Hispanics in Texas and the Southwest; and face it, in 15 years, the Hispanic vote will be very hard to ignore. </p>

<p>And though he is privileged and is thoroughly a Bush, don’t forget Gramps referred to him as one of the ‘little brown ones’. </p>

<p>Yep…future looks good for George P from any vantage point.</p>

19

<p>

</p>

<p>Well, actually that’s an easy sound bite/spin to put on it, but according to a recent ABC/WP poll, the reason the ratings of the Congress are so low has to do with a) the Republicans in Congress have an significantly lower rating than the Democrats (remember it’s not made up of just Democrats now that the Dems have a slim majority) and b) on the Democratic side the ratings the Dems have are largely because they haven’t done enough, in the eyes of many, to counter the mistakes and problems of the Administration and the formerly Republican-controlled Congress, not because they are doing what they said they’d do. Some of this is quite readily visible in the numbers:</p>

<p><a href=“http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/ssi/polls/postpoll_072307.html?hpid=topnews[/url]”>http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/ssi/polls/postpoll_072307.html?hpid=topnews&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>After seeing about the respective ratings of the parties in Congress, go down to questions17- 24. People aren’t uniformly cynical about Congress; they are much more disheartened with where this Administration and 6 years of a Republican-controlled Congress put us. And secondarily, they are upset that the very slim majority (particularly in the Senate) haven’t been able to wield authority to do much about it. That’s a different read than “people hate the Democratic Congress.”</p>

<p>At this point, I am joined by a vast majority of people in this country who really wish we didn’t have this particular Republican president, even now by my dyed-in-the-wool Republican parents.</p>

20

<p>At least JE didnt use spit like Paul Wolfowitz did.</p>