<p>Hey there, Georgie Girl,</p>
<p>You raise some excellent points. I really like USC, and it is on the long list for both of my kids. However, in response to the article in the Telegraph and my earlier comments:</p>
<p>1) London and the surrounding suburbs (the “Home Counties”) has 20 million (out of 60m) UK people and a much larger percentage of the UK’s wealth and spending power. Therefore, historically a disproportionate number of British kids applying to UK universities are typically from the Southeast of England as their parents can afford the expense. This will probably increase now as 9 of the top 10 British private high schools are in/near London. Also, these are the kids who are being adversely affected by the Government’ unofficial quotas on the number of private school kids going to Oxford and Cambridge and hence applying to the US Ivy League and other top US schools. I know that there are kids from places like Belfast, Leeds and Liverpool who get scholarships to the Ivy League, but they are the exception, rather than the rule; </p>
<p>2) I am sure that the data in the Telegraph article is probably correct, but I am equally sure that the writer took it out of context. Harvard, Penn and NYU make sense and I am sure that USC is popular with UK kids (but not the most popular) but Stanford would be the first choice for top British students wanting to study in California, and NYU would be more popular among the larger private colleges. As I mentioned, he could have mixed in American citizens, graduate students, kids from the Middle East who went to British boarding schools, etc.; and </p>
<p>3) BYU, seriously? This makes the article less credible. The UK is not a very religious society, particularly among the white, English population. I just can’t imagine BYU (#75 in US News’ rankings) being that popular with hard-working and hard-drinking British 18 year olds.</p>