<p>I will go a step further, and make the point it isn’t just about teaching, it is how we as parents behave. Ask anyone who knows about child development, and they will tell you that children often pick up a lot more from the way a parent behaves, the subtle clues and body language, then they do from what we say, in effect, attitudes and behavior are caught, not taught. If you teach one thing, and do another (do as I say, not as I do), there is a good chance that the child will model what you do. I will also add that kids learn empathy and respect when they are treated like that, based on my own experiences most of the kids that were bullies when I was growing up, or the ones I see as an adult, are kids who when I saw the families they came from it was pretty easy to see why (obviously, sometimes there are other issues, I am talking about common reasons, not all). </p>
<p>The other answer is people have to get off this notion that somehow bullying is normal, that ‘kids have survived bullying for years’, or that bullying is part of “kids will be kids”, it isn’t, and there is nothing beneficial about bullying, it doesn’t help someone grow up, and saying ‘grow a thick skin, you are going to need it’ is lame, because that is dismissing the very real consequences of it. When I was in high school, a kid ended up shooting a classmate to death and it turned out the kid, who was small and slight, had been bullied and finally cracked (not excusing what he did), and as a result two kids lives were ruined. School administrators for years had the attitude like it was normal behavior, or nothing they could do, and there needs to be zero tolerance there.</p>
<p>Just as bad is the trend to recognize that the bully has been bullied, and out of sympathy dismiss what the kid did with “well, they are a victim, too”. Yes, that is true, and the bullier needs help, but that is not grounds to dismiss what they have been doing, either. There needs to be zero tolerance with bullying, if a kid is found to be a bully, they should have the chance to work on their issues, but if it continues then there needs to be consequences for it. </p>
<p>And while I don’t think someone should be sent to jail for being a bully, I think if someone is a bully and their action leads to dire consequences, that they should be help responsible for what happens. If someone is an alchoholic and drives drunk, they have to pay the penalty for the consequences, whether it actually harms someone or not; if someone is a bully, and their bullying leads to a negative consequence, unless the bully is found to be mentally incompetent, they should pay whatever penalty the law allows, otherwise society is telling the victims that they don’t matter. It has to be used sparingly, and with good reason, but it should be used. And given that the impact of bullying is made worse by things like twitter and other net based technology, it has only gotten worse. </p>
<p>I think one of the things I have found most sad in recent cases like the kid at Rutgers, or where the girl in Mass killed herself because of cyber bullying, is people arguing that those that perpetuated the bullying had no culpability, that ‘thousands of kids are bullied and don’t commit suicide, these kids were already mentally ill, etc, they should grow a thick skin, an so forth’. What they miss is a very basic fact, that it is likely that had they not been bullied, the kid wouldn’t have killed themselves. That would be like arguing that a group of kids who knowingly smeared peanut butter on a kid who was allergic to peanuts and the kid died from an allergic reaction, were not guilty because it was the fault of the kid for being sensitive (and even if they didn’t know, they could be held liable, since smearing peanut butter on the kid was not exactly something they should have been doing in the first place).</p>