Buying A New (or Used) Car Experience During Supply Chain Shortages

You definitely don’t live and drive in the SF Bay Area. The home of the “How fast can I drive my Tesla while simultaneously fiddling around with my console screen and drinking my tall no-foam, no-whip, decaf mocha.” :grinning:

We can debate fast and slow cars and trucks all day long, but again, it’s a matter of the individual user and where you live.

Without going through my auto CV, IMO, a 9-second 0-60 is molasses. A 2021 Toyota Corolla, which is a very popular car sold today, does a 7.95 second 0-60. And I’ve been given a Corolla by the dealer on a couple occasions while my Toyota was being serviced. Woof, what a dog.

Most cars in the area are not Teslas, and most drivers accelerate on freeway on-ramps like they were driving overloaded VW Buses.

3 Likes

I didn’t say “most cars in the area are Teslas.” I just said:

Which was said tongue-in-cheek BTW. And what’s funnier is that you then said:

You must have had a bad day. Maybe you meant Yellow School Buses, because VW Buses are nearly extinct as the dinosaurs on the roads today.

Just hasn’t been my experience. And in my neighborhood, Teslas are EXTREMELY popular. They’re built in Fremont, as I’m sure you know.

1 Like

Perfect car for a teen. :wink:

2 Likes

Absolutely. Forgive me, I’m jaded by my age and history.

1 Like

Lol. My husband and I made a couple of used Corollas (out of brand new ones) for our kiddos. Zero to sixty in oh-my-god-so-slow-I’m-gonna-die seconds was one of the reasons… kept them out of trouble. :wink: My husband has a “slow” Tesla. Every time he rents a car or drives our truck, his first comment is “not a Tesla”. Lol. Bet he can’t wait for Hertz’s new fleet.

1 Like

For those old enough, the “fast” cars when they were teenagers were slower than the “slow” Corolla of today.

3 Likes

But they were huge, so they felt so fast…

1 Like

7.95 seconds? Oy, speak for yourself sir. :wink: Depends on our ages, I suppose. I wasn’t around when the Model T was raced. :laughing:

Again, I’m not going to go through my CV here, but if we got in Mr. Peabody’s Way Back Machine, running a 2021 Corolla at the track back in my day would be an embarrassment.

1 Like

If we’re just talking about stock family cars then the Corolla isn’t slow compared to many older cars. Now, if we’re talking hot rods, etc, that’s a different story. Here’s a stock Mustang, hardly to be considered slow for the times.

The 1964.5 Mustang had either a 6-cylinder or 260 ci V8. The Mustang wasn’t considered a performance vehicle by any stretch of the imagination. The example above is a 260 ci V8 engine BTW.

A few months later, designated the 1965 model year, the 260 ci was bored to a 289 ci engine. The 289 engine could be ordered with with a 2 bbl V8, 4 bbl V8 or 4 bbl HP V8 engine. The latter of which had 271 HP. And 4-speeds were faster than automatics back then, if driven properly.

Ford then hired Carroll Shelby to take the Mustang from a “Secretary’s car” (their terminology back then, not mine, think “Mad Men”) and make it a performance car as well, since the 1967 Chevy Camaro with much bigger engines, a 327ci or 396 ci big block, was coming very soon.

The 1965 Shelby Mustang had 306 HP. One could also spend the really big bucks and buy a 289 or 427 AC or Shelby Cobra from Ford in that time frame and now we’re talking fast. The 427 Shelby Cobra ran 0-60 in about 4.0-4.5 seconds IIRC again.

So, my point is, a 7.95 second 0-60 time for the Corolla is slow. Back then and today. And most kids modded their cars aka “Day 2” mods, meaning “Day 1” was driving off the showroom floor in a stock configuration. “Day 2” was adding bigger radial tires, because the tires back then were bias ply and too skinny for any kind of performance, headers, dual exhaust system, larger carburetor, bigger camshaft, supercharger, etc.

One more thing. The 1965-1966 Shelby Cobra is still considered one of the fastest (or faster cars) in the world today.

Car & Driver TEST RESULTS from 1965:

60 mph: 4.3 sec
100 mph: 8.8 sec
1/4 mile: 12.2 sec @ 118 mph
Top speed: 165 mph

1 Like

Well, if you’re talking obvious “sports cars” then obviously they are slightly faster. You’ve chosen the higher end of the speed spectrum to compare to a lowly Corolla that still beats a 65 mustang with a V8 engine. Sure there were faster cars and modified cars then. We have the same now. The fact is what’s considered a slow car today would run circles around most standard vehicles from 1965. Apples to apples, not oranges.

Consumer Reports ranked 28 brands for reliability. The top 10 best brands are:

  1. Lexus
  2. Mazda
  3. Toyota
  4. Infiniti
  5. Buick
  6. Honda
  7. Subaru
  8. Acura
  9. Nissan
  10. Mini

Next tier:

  1. Hyundai
  2. Chrysler
  3. Porsche
  4. Chevrolet
  5. Audi
  6. Cadillac
  7. BMW
  8. Ford

The bottom (worst) 10 car brands for reliability:

  1. Kia
  2. Volvo
  3. Ram
  4. GMC
  5. Mercedes-Benz
  6. VW
  7. Genisis
  8. Jeep
  9. Tesla
  10. Lincoln

Mitsubishi, Jaguar, Land Rover, & Dodge were not ranked by CR.

The new cars have the benefit of tires and technology off the showroom floor. That’s why old cars were modded on Day 2. And you could order from various engine options, which you can’t do today.

Look, we’re way off topic. I could argue cars all day long. But I stand by my opinion. A 0-60 of 7.95 seconds is SLOW to me. Back then or now.

1 Like

It is definitely a seller’s market, and will likely remain so for the foreseeable future – at least a year.

However, that also means it is a great time – probably the best time anyone can remember – to sell or trade your vehicle.

We’ve offered more – and this is trade value, not retail – for year-old-with-20000-miles cars and, even moreso, trucks, than what those vehicles originally stickered for (MSRP).

If you need to upgrade, I recommend the used car market. Prices are higher than they were a year ago for the same used car, but the markups aren’t approaching the current new car price gouging.

I raced my 305 Camaro against a El Camino and got beat. If I had a 350, maybe. El Camino was sneaky fast

I disagree with your blanket recommendation that buying used cars is a better deal as new car “price gouging” varies by dealership and by car model. Some dealers do not charge a “market adjustment” premium above MSRP.

The used car market is quite expensive. Easiest way to judge whether buying new or used is a better deal is to compare car prices set by Carvana & by CarMax against new car prices for the same model.

(We just bought a new car with the full manufacturer’s 36,000 miles / 3 year bumper-to-bumper warranty for the same price as a one or two year old model with 32,000 miles for the same price as that set for used models by CarMax. AND we paid a $2,500 surcharge above MSRP. So, in our case, buying new was a far better deal than buying used from either CarMax or Carvana.)

P.S. Welcome to the thread !

1 Like

Kelley and NADA are what we typically use to estimate trade value. Kelley ICO is the best because it is the most detailed – no two used cars are the same, and in the ICO form you can put in a great deal of detail, especially damage and aftermarket parts.

But those are book values, and even stalwarts like Kelley and NADA can miss on a car’s value. The true value is dictated by the market – and they don’t always have all the data.

We price low when we sell the cars, and that is taken into account as well. Some dealers price high and give more for trades. But not everyone is trading a vehicle, so to us it’s better to set low prices on everything we sell, relative to market. If you are trading, and you want to find the best deal, pick the place giving you the lowest result when you subtract trade offer from the price of the car you are buying. So many people get caught up on the trade offer alone (I want retail for my trade! uh, no.) – also consider the discount you receive on the car you are buying.

To justify the prices of the cars we are selling, we use proprietary software which lists the prices of all similar vehicles (year, model, trim level) within 200, 500, a thousand miles of our dealership. They can be ranked by price or, more important imo, value (taking price and miles into account). We show these lists to people who think our price is too high. “See – we’re value-ranked #5 in the Midwest out of 77 similar cars. It’s a very good price.”

Because we sell some relatively rare sports/luxury cars, we do some long distance sales which require shipping. And let me tell you, we try very hard to show every little blemish on a car to the long distance buyer, because nobody likes bad surprises… but it still happens occasionally, despite thorough walkaround vids and photos, there’s some scratch we failed to show them. It can be a headache. I wouldn’t want to work in Carvana’s customer service debit. It’s hard to ascertain the true condition of a vehicle through photos alone.

But the reason, or a large reason, that used cars are less likely to gouge you than new cars, in this climate, is (aside from greater used car supply than new car supply, relative to normal conditions) that everyone has access to Kelley and NaDA – they can get a pretty good idea of a used car’s retail value. And if you charge above that, you have a fight on your hands unless the proprietary market data supports it – and even then some think we’re just making it up.

“Kelley says it should be $24500!”

“Well, Kelley doesn’t always reflect the market. As you can see, in the Midwest we’re #3 on price at $25000, and #1 in value.”