<p>Caltech page: “It serves as good preparation for graduate school and helps to explain why Caltech has the highest percentage of alumni who go on to receive a PhD of all the major universities.”
<a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caltech[/url]”>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caltech</a></p>
<p>Mudd page: “A third of the student body are National Merit Scholars, and about 40 percent of graduates go on to earn a Ph.D.the highest rate of any college or university in the nation.”
<a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_Mudd[/url]”>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_Mudd</a></p>
<p>Which is correct?</p>
<p>I think Caltech’s PhD rate is about 36% and Harvey Mudd’s is about 25%. Both have the highest two rates in the country though with Swarthmore and Reed just behind.</p>
<p>That 40% number must be wrong though.</p>
<p>I believe Mudd is slightly behind Caltech. Only slighty. :)</p>
<p>i read 37.7% vs 37.5% mudd/caltech (or something very similar in that order) somewhere. the phd productivity stats that are most commonly alluded to are those between 1993 and 2003. i know for sure that mudd had a huge phd boost in 2005… on the order of 10% comparatively to previous years.</p>
<p>I say: who really cares? If you want to get a PhD, you’ll get one whether you go to Caltech or Mudd for undergrad.</p>