As I’ve learned more about colleges through CC I sometimes try to (roughly) equate schools in different states to each other using good 'ole analogies (which I think, btw, are not longer on the SAT?).
By ‘equate’ I mean they attract similar student types, plus they are generally same size, reputation and selectivity…
Anyway, if you care to play add your own! And, remember, this is for fun and hopefully a little insight so let’s not get too serious here. Finally, using less well known colleges would make this more interesting, IMHO.
An easy one to start:
UNC is to NC is like UVA is to Virginia.
And, perhaps:
App State is to NC is like James Madison is to Virginia
And,
Bucknell is to PA like Wake Forest is to NC (??)
Finally,
Franklin & Marshall is to PA like University of Richmond is to VA
So, what are your college analogies, oh wise CC pros? And feel to use 3 colleges if you want to level up!
Pomona is to California as Harvard is to Mass (Pomona of the east).
Evergreen St is to Washington what Humboldt St is to California
Miami Ohio and Miami Florida
Ah, got it. Not really clear as there seem to be two different kinds of analogies going. You were talking about the flagship public university in each state being analogous to each other.
@ucbalumnus Purdue in Indiana also fits in that list with Michigan State in Michigan. That Is why I said etc. These are all land- grant universities and there are many of them, including Purdue.
@Marilyn, The OP is interested in how to “equate schools in different states” and said to “feel free to use three colleges.” So, since you object to my example , I will keep it to 3 colleges (as was done in post #1 in regard to flagships).
Virginia Tech is to Virginia as NC State is to North Carolina as Clemson is to South Carolina. They are all land-grants that are not the flagship universities in their state (which are UVA, UNC, USC).
Many land–grant universities are also the state flagship (Wisconsin, Connecticut, for example). My examples in #7 were land–grants that are not the flagship in their state.
@sevmom , I didn’t object to your list; just didn’t see an analogy. Someone else thought they were supposed to be engineering flagships, then you said they were land grants, then you said they were land grants that were not flagships. Seems like more of a categorization than an analogy if that’s the only commonality.