<p>@mantori.suzuki</p>
<p>Yes, that’s correct.</p>
<p>Back to her income-earning potential… I’m wondering what month she’ll be appearing in Playboy?</p>
<p>Anyplace I’ve never heard of is the sticks. Also anyplace I’ve never been to. And anyplace more than 100 miles from where I am.</p>
<p>You bunch of hillbillies.</p>
<p>What is the maximum sentence she could get? What do you all think she will eventually get?</p>
<p>Wasn’t there a heart shaped sticker (matching stickers in the home) found with the body (or imprint of it)? And same with her stuffed animal or blankie or the like? Wouldn’t only someone from the family be involved in such a “burial”? And would a grandfather really use a heart shaped sticker??</p>
<p>And would a former police detective dump her in a swampy woods very close to his home? He ain’t stupid. None of that is plausible. </p>
<p>The laundry bag was also from the home. A stranger didn’t do it.</p>
<p>“Casey later dumps the body in the woods…after she goes to her parents’ home first to bag, etc.”</p>
<p>After putting duct tape on the corpse? I just can’t imagine that.</p>
<p>She’ll probably end up with time served as she’s been in jail for a year and her charges have a max of 1-2 years each IIRC</p>
<p>*mom2collegekids…I also was laughing at the reference of Orlando being “the sticks” when I read that post! If he thinks Orlando is the sticks, I wonder what he thinks of my town of 1700 people? Outer space??? LOL *</p>
<p>I know!!!</p>
<p>It reminded me of that idiot on TV that claimed that UA Huntsville was in the sticks after the shooting by Amy Bishop last year. I personally contacted him and set him straight. Good heavens, there’s an international airport practically within walking distance of UAH. The “sticks” ??? hardly. lol…He did later apologize profusely.</p>
<p>jsanche-
“argument”?
was it not a “fact” that she did the searches? if so, pretty incongruous for Casey to do searches like that IMO, but maybe she was a chemistry or murder mystery maven LOL…</p>
<p>speculation is speculation
but what are the facts?
an argument can not be made with some facts to base it on</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I don’t think Playboy would stoop…okay, this sounds weird, but anyway…would stoop that low. But there’s always Hustler and Penthouse (if they’re still publishing…I sowed my wild oats a while ago and haven’t kept up). And in the few seconds it took me to type this, I have gone from thinking this was a joke to actually expecting it to happen. It’s completely plausible. Remember the “hot body contest”?</p>
<p>*Quote:
And…you don’t have to buy chloroform…it is easily made with basic products…acetone, bleach, rubbing alcohol, pool shock, etc. and ice.</p>
<p>==================================</p>
<p>Folks, I think we’ve got our new suspect… *</p>
<p>I’m so busted now…you guys can now call me Krystal…or River, if you prefer.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I read that each of the four counts of misleading can get one year in jail. But these can be served concurrently. Further, she has already done a few years in jail. Thus, I am guessing she may be free on Thursday.</p>
<p>She will be credited with time served to whatever sentence she gets, so I’m guessing it will be minimal.</p>
<p>There are no facts.</p>
<p>This is their logic: You searched for chloroform on the internet which means you used it to kill your child.</p>
<p>Crazy isn’t it?</p>
<p>there was a dispute on the chloroform searches… the prosecutors witness first said it was searched 84 times…however later this was reduced to 1 time and the 84 searches were myspace searches… i think that was going to be an appeal issue that the evidence was allowed to stand that it was 84…i watched something about that when they were outside of the jury.</p>
<p>Just heard on the news that she was found not guilty…this was just a quick blip and not the whole story. The whole story will be aired at 5:00.</p>
<p>did the prosecution argue that the duct tape with the heart thingie on it (tying it to Casey) could have been put on poor Caylee’s mouth AFTER she was dead to prevent fluids from coming out while she was in the trunk/to hide the evidence?
If so—Foxy for sure, even if not the direct murderer…</p>
<p>So, was she or was she not involved? did she lie? did she somehow allow her child to die? at the minimum, did the prosecution’s case prove any of that? and if it did, did the jury mis-judge?</p>
<p>She was found innocent, which i support…but i also believe she is fully involved in this death,but no evidence to support my belief</p>
<p>So she’s not guilty and will be looking for a job at some time in the future.
Would you hire her to be your nanny?</p>
<p>Yeah, me neither.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Thanks, let us know what you find out.</p>