<p>Longtime readers of the CC Parents Forum may recall a discussion last year about an LA Times op/ed piece written by Catherine Seipp in which she talked about her daughter Maia’s college admissions experience. </p>
<p>According to the article, Maia was a high school junior, a bright kid at a private HS who had taken a number of courses at a community college in a difficult language (perhaps Russian), with a good but not stellar GPA and good but not stellar SAT scores. Seipp was dismissive of the high school administrators who advised her daughter to complete four years of high school, and she encouraged Maia to apply to college during her junior year. When rejections came in from several of the highly-ranked colleges to which Maia applied, Seipp was incredulous - what was wrong with these adcoms? True, her daughter did get admitted to several colleges, but they were schools with lower rankings and higher acceptance rates, and Seipp seemed convinced that they weren’t good enough for her child. She confessed to only one moment of self-doubt about encouraging Maia to skip senior year, when a college professor friend she respected gently suggested that perhaps Maia should think about taking courses at a CC for a couple of years then transferring to a four-year school. But the story ended happily for Seipp and her daughter when Maia was accepted at at least one college that Seipp found worthy, thus proving Seipp right and the naysayers wrong.</p>
<p>At least, that’s how I read it at the time.</p>
<p>When a thread discussing the article popped up on CC, I happily joined in: not only was I annoyed by what I saw as Seipp’s arrogance and sense of entitlement, but also (to be honest), I was offended that she had characterized the college my daughter attends as unworthy of her child. The discussion went on for a few days, with both Seipp and Maia joining in, and Seipp later wrote about it in her column in the National Review online. I remember feeling sorry for Maia, who had to endure such not only the original story but also the CC discussion, and did so with uncommon grace for a seventeen-year-old.</p>
<p>Today, the LA Times carried Catherine Seipp’s obituary, and I discovered that what I read as arrogance in her article was, in fact, desperation. A single parent, “Seipp…was diagnosed with lung cancer five years ago…One of her final goals was to see her daughter, Maia, off to college. Maia finished high school in three years, and enrolled at UC San Diego last fall.”</p>
<p>How difficult it must have been for Maia last year, knowing that her mother was dying, feeling the pressure to fulfill her last wish, and enduring a very public dissection of her college applications. I’m sure Maia is no longer a reader of CC, but I’d like to offer her my condolences on the loss of the mother who was clearly so proud of her, and publicly apologize for my part in last year’s discussion.</p>
<p>I’m once again reminded that it is wrong to rush to judgment until one walks a mile in another’s shoes.</p>