If they are, as they noted later, not wanting debt and law school - then 100% yes. That conversation has happened earlier.
But language just came up - the original was Philosophy - and Rutgers (in-state) is near tops as is Pitt (not as cheap).
So if they truly have a budget, then yes - because you need to build a list based on budget - no different than my $50K budget (but full pay kid) - couldn’t apply to the Cornell’s a Gtowns because of it - but could apply to W&L because it could get to cost (she got in but at $81K) it came right off - as was known.
If they don’t have a budget, then no. But too many budget driven kids simply apply to schools that make zero sense - because they like the name. That name is likely not going to pay back the monthly payments for 10+ years.
Most kids who say - I got into schools I can’t afford - it’s because they put name ahead of cost and it should be the other way around, especially if you are thinking law school, because you can go from most any undergrad to any top law school.
The student is exceptional and came with a prestige driven list - and that’s ok. But the tradeoff to said list, if they choose one of those schools, is likely significant debt if they attend law school. If you read up from the first few posts, there was a lot of discussion on this.
The student had mentioned not wanting law school debt - so when I hear about future visits to non merit schools vs. merit schools, I cringe. Or if, and it was asked, will the student go to $35K Rutgers or $90k+ Cornell and the answer is Rutgers, then that’s another reason to optimize for schools that you would consider vs. schools that my academic record would justify. In essence, that fine academic record will bring money at many schools - so it’s still being utilized. Maybe it’s F&M instead of Swat - but that affordability at F&M would be because of that academic record….for the same reason, so many Southern schools are loaded with NMFs - they “buy” in the high stat students that have their pick of schools otherwise.
I’m not OP so I can’t answer - but just adding to previous discussions - where it appeared to be an aversion to significant debt.
Thanks