Chavez leads gloating over vote

<p><a href=“http://www.washingtontimes.com/world/20061108-112234-5597r.htm[/url]”>http://www.washingtontimes.com/world/20061108-112234-5597r.htm&lt;/a&gt;
Just adding to the fun of all these political discussions. :)</p>

<p>

</code></pre>

<p>Sadly, this guy is going to steal the thunder of TD and his minion-mackerels.</p>

<p>Obviously, Tehran wires Democrats in Washington for the latest talking points. :)</p>

<p>WooHoo - if there is an attack and the Democrats are found responsible due to a weakening of national defense…they will be toast (plain ole white-bread toast, too!).</p>

<p>You mean if the gathering U.S. forces on Iran’s borders decide to attack?</p>

<p>Are you kidding? :slight_smile: The Republicans just got creamed. I suspect Bush’ll draw back a bit. He’s no political fool…see how fast Rummy got the shove?</p>

<p>p2n,</p>

<p>Cut mini some slack.</p>

<p>The updated talking-points from the International Komintern have as yet not arrived: those clowns are nothing if not inefficient.</p>

<p>“WooHoo - if there is an attack and the Democrats are found responsible due to a weakening of national defense…they will be toast (plain ole white-bread toast, too!).”</p>

<p>Just trying to find out who’s attacking, and whose toast? Last time I looked, Iran hadn’t attacked anyone in a very, very long time. More than I can say of some countries I know… As for whether George Bush is a political fool, I say, “WYSIWYG”.</p>

<p>Stay the course.</p>

<p>Actually mini if you knew what you were talking about you would no that that Iran essentially attacked Israel this summer through proxy, by giving weapons, money, training, equipment to Hezbollah. You would also know that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard was in Lebanon fighting Israel.</p>

<p>Stay the course.</p>

<p>By that reasoning, the U.S. attacked Lebanon, with billions and billions of dollars in weapons, equipment, and training. And I’m absolutely positive you already knew that. And, by comparison, Iran’s share with a tiny pittance.</p>

<p>Stay the course.</p>

<p>“You know, one of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror” George W. Bush, during a recent (9/6/06) interview with Katie Couric</p>

<p>“The only way we can win is to leave before the job is done” George W. Bush, November 4, 2006</p>

<p>War is not the answer! The American people have spoken. The course is done.</p>

<p>war has never solved anything. rite?</p>

<p>Well, it cured Nazism pretty well and gave Communism quite a whack.</p>

<p>FS - you mean the comrades have yet to get the latest and greatest news out to the ‘fellow travelers’? </p>

<p>Nyet! :frowning: Please find a guilty party to shoot.</p>

<p>Nine grams of lead will be their final ration!</p>

<p>dotn forget slavery too</p>

<p>stay the course.</p>

<p>No Golani, I never said that…it’s just important to understand that so many of the posters are in a sense, “gloating” about the Dem win, myself included. I think the majority of American people feel that the way this war has been handled from the beginning has been wrong and not particularly well thought out. There has been anger and disgust building in our country…wanting to place blame. I see the recent election as a sort of confirmation that the American people want change. So many innocent lives on all sides have been lost. I know it’s not that simple, but that is how I feel.</p>

<p>So you think it would be best to leave Iraq. Just like that pack up your **** and leave. Sort of like what Israel did 2 summers ago?</p>

<p>stay the course.</p>

<p>As I said, it’s not that simple. Your comment smacked of sarcasm where none was warranted. I look forward to seeing things unfold in a more appropriate and well thought out way. Whatever that means. Enough is enough.</p>

<p>What course…the course is over.</p>

<p>if thats the democrats idea of “over” god help us</p>

<p>The Left spin recently seems to be trending “No matter when the U.S. leaves Iraq, its going to collapse anyways - so best just to do it now”</p>

<p>Fake “Republican” and flying Lib radio host Don Imus and his (usual leftie) guests - were spinning big time this morning on this theme</p>

<p>Finally some on the left are admitting they really do believe in cut and run, and they are clearly stating why</p>

<p>Basically they are CERTAIN terrorists and Islamic hardliners will overrun Iraq longer term - so just give up now</p>

<p>As for america’s “word” that they would stick with Iraq and its people</p>

<p>Why doesn’t it surprise me that liberals could care less about america’s ability to commit to a cause, keep its word, and not abandon a people - where millions came out on mutiple occassions to vote at great risk to their own personal safety</p>

<p>As for America’s word to Iraqis, perhaps we should inspect the encouragement that Bush 41 gave them to revolt against Saddam Hussein after with withdrew at the end of Desert Storm. The Shiites in the south revolted, we did nothing, and Saddam hanged them from tank barrels. </p>

<p>Now this was only a decade after Cheney was in Baghdad giving aid to Saddam Hussein for the Iraqis against Iran, so maybe the message was mixed, eh?</p>