Checklist for Evaluating Honors Programs/Colleges

<p>I originally posted this on the College Search forum, but per a request from a parent I am again posting this on the parents forum, here 'tis:</p>

<p>At various times on the CC boards questions arise regarding whether there are any comparative standards to use in evaluating honors programs/colleges. The short answer is not much. However, the National Collegiate Honors Council (with membership of hundreds of public and private colleges and universities with honors programs/colleges) has published some criteria (quoted below) for the “Basic Characteristics of a Fully Developed Honors Program” that could be useful to those exploring one honors program versus another. For instance, here’s one useful nugget: the honors “program requirements themselves should include a substantial portion of the participants’ undergraduate work, usually in the vicinity of 20% or 25% of their total course work and certainly no less than 15%.”</p>

<p>Here’s the entire quote from the National Collegiate Honors Council’s website:</p>

<p>"Basic Characteristics of a Fully Developed Honors Program</p>

<p>No one model of an honors program can be superimposed on all types of institutions. However, there are characteristics which are common to successful, fully-developed honors programs. Listed below are those characteristics, although not all characteristics are necessary for an honors program to be considered a successful and/or fully-developed honors program. </p>

<p>A fully-developed honors program should be carefully set up to accommodate the special needs and abilities of the undergraduate students it is designed to serve. This entails identifying the targeted student population by some clearly articulated set of criteria (e.g., GPA, SAT score, a written essay). A program with open admission needs to spell out expectations for retention in the program and for satisfactory completion of program requirements. </p>

<p>The program should have a clear mandate from the institutional administration ideally in the form of a mission statement clearly stating the objectives and responsibilities of the program and defining its place in both the administrative and academic structure of the institution. This mandate or mission statement should be such as to assure the permanence and stability of the program by guaranteeing an adequate budget and by avoiding any tendency to force the program to depend on temporary or spasmodic dedication of particular faculty members or administrators. In other words, the program should be fully institutionalized so as to build thereby a genuine tradition of excellence.</p>

<p>The honors director should report to the chief academic officer of the institution.</p>

<p>There should be an honors curriculum featuring special courses, seminars, colloquia and independent study established in harmony with the mission statement and in response to the needs of the program.</p>

<p>The program requirements themselves should include a substantial portion of the participants’ undergraduate work, usually in the vicinity of 20% or 25% of their total course work and certainly no less than 15%. Students who successfully complete Honors Programs requirements should receive suitable institutional recognition. This can be accomplished by such measures as an appropriate notation on the student’s academic transcript, separate listing of Honors Graduates in commencement programs, and the granting of an Honors degree.</p>

<p>The program should be so formulated that it relates effectively both to all the college work for the degree (e.g., by satisfying general education requirements) and to the area of concentration, departmental specialization, pre-professional or professional training.</p>

<p>The program should be both visible and highly reputed throughout the institution so that it is perceived as providing standards and models of excellence for students and faculty across the campus.</p>

<p>Faculty participating in the program should be fully identified with the aims of the program. They should be carefully selected on the basis of exceptional teaching skills and the ability to provide intellectual leadership to able students.</p>

<p>The program should occupy suitable quarters constituting an honors center with such facilities as an honors library, lounge, reading rooms, personal computers and other appropriate decor.</p>

<p>The director or other administrative officer charged with administering the program should work in close collaboration with a committee or council of faculty members representing the colleges and/or departments served by the program.</p>

<p>The program should have in place a committee of honors students to serve as liaison with the honors faculty committee or council who must keep the student group fully informed on the program and elicit their cooperation in evaluation and development. This student group should enjoy as much autonomy as possible conducting the business of the committee in representing the needs and concerns of all honors students to the administration, and it should also be included in governance, serving on the advisory/policy committee as well as constituting the group that governs the student association.</p>

<p>There should be provisions for special academic counseling of honors students by uniquely qualified faculty and/or staff personnel. </p>

<p>The honors program, in distinguishing itself from the rest of the institution, serves as a kind of laboratory within which faculty can try things they have always wanted to try but for which they could find no suitable outlet. When such efforts are demonstrated to be successful, they may well become institutionalized, thereby raising the general level of education within the college or university for all students. In this connection, the honors curriculum should serve as a prototype for educational practices that can work campus-wide in the future. </p>

<p>The fully-developed honors program must be open to continuous and critical review and be prepared tochange in order to maintain its distinctive position of offering distinguished education to the best students in the institution.</p>

<p>A fully-developed program will emphasize the participatory nature of the honors educational process by adopting such measures as offering opportunities for students to participate in regional and national conferences, honors semesters, international programs, community service, and other forms of experiential education.</p>

<p>Fully-developed two-year and four-year honors programs will have articulation agreements by which honors graduates from two-year colleges are accepted into four-year honors programs when they meet previously agreed-upon requirements."</p>

<p>Just a note on the practical implications of having a short checklist on potential honors programs based on the National Collegiate Honors Council critiera. A potential snoozer standard but with some definite practical application, the head or dean of the honors program/college reports to the Chief Academic Officer (often titled “provost”) of the institution. Clout in the budget fights for the limited academic bucks for the honors program to get its fair share is what this criteria means. Reporting to the Chief Academic Officer also immediately gives higher academic visibility and reputation within the institution. One example of not meeting this criteria, the honors program struggles in mediocrity now and in the coming years when your child is attending (one major Texas state university’s honors program has had this burden of reporting to lower level university officials and being short-changed in the process which was noted in an external critique of the honors program at that university). For those who know me, this unnamed institution was not Texas Tech which has a vibrant honors college.</p>

<p>The point - translate the NCHC criteria into a short checklist and see if the respective honors programs you and your child are considering are up-to-snuff.</p>

<p>Thanks for the info lonestardad! :)</p>

<p>Just as a note of interest,the founding Dean of the Barrett Honors college at Arizona State U was also a founding member and former president of the Honors Council.Barrett’s was modeled after these guidelines and remains a shining example of how an Honors College should be structured.</p>

<p>Along with Arizona State, some other big-name public universities that are members of the National Collegiate Honors Council (NCHC) are the University of Michigan, Penn State, Ohio State, Indiana University, Arizona, and UT-Austin. Also represented in NCHC membership are scads of community colleges and small four-year private colleges as well.</p>

<p>I think the description in the first post is great, but overwhelming. The learning curve for us this fall was brutal. After telling us for years that she wanted to stay very close to home, D decided she was willing to go further.</p>

<p>We went from 0 honors program knowledge in September to 5 visits by mid-October. All programs are NOT created equal.</p>

<p>Perhaps we can boil down the description to help next year’s folks.</p>