<p>[The</a> Associated Press: University of Chicago to allow co-ed dorm rooms](<a href=“http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h4azBDjxFPAfvYw68pPHjfnq51PgD957NOP80]The”>http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h4azBDjxFPAfvYw68pPHjfnq51PgD957NOP80)</p>
<p>What do you guys think about this?</p>
<p>Perhaps this is an opportunity for Sartre/Beauvoir relationships of our time?</p>
<p>The AP article is misleading on many levels. I’ll point out an open letter on the student government blog that more clearly states the purpose and intent of the open housing agreement.</p>
<p>[Student</a> Government Blog Open Housing Article in Trib](<a href=“http://sg.uchicago.edu/blog/2008/12/21/open-housing-article-in-trib/]Student”>http://sg.uchicago.edu/blog/2008/12/21/open-housing-article-in-trib/)</p>
<p>The status quo remains unchanged: most students like living in single-sex room situations and housing will not change that. It’s for students who WANT sex not to be a determining factor in pairing roommates that can sign up for open housing, and two open-housing candidates will be matched.</p>