<p>“GOLDEN, Colo. A Colorado woman who told police she wanted to be a “cool mom” has admitted hosting weekly sex parties for high school boys”</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.ktre.com/Global/story.asp?S=3637901[/url]”>http://www.ktre.com/Global/story.asp?S=3637901</a></p>
<p>My My My</p>
<p>Of course I read CC!</p>
<p>I was just trying to provide all of these kids with some interesting ECs to write about!</p>
<p>Pow zing! Hook it up cool mom! Why is this woman not charged with statatory rape and be threatened with the death penalty? If a man did this he would be totally blasted in the media and people would say he should get life in prison. But since a woman did it, everyone just blows it off and says the boys were lucky. I wouldn’t be shocked if this skankazoid just got probation. They need gender equality in laws badly.</p>
<p>Men are generally not as bothered by such activity. Hard to send someone to jail when there is little harm done.</p>
<p>I would agree with joev.</p>
<p>Consider barrons quote: “Men are generally not as bothered by such activity. Hard to send someone to jail when there is little harm done.”</p>
<p>Imagine a man (e.g. the president of Harvard) making a similar statement to that above except replacing the word Men with Women. His career would be finished.</p>
<p>If your philosophy/religion is that all boys want to have unlimited sex and there is nothing wrong with it and it does no harm, then by all means if this happens to your son do not opt for prosecution (at least on the sex charges). But some people feel that sex outside of marriage is wrong, and that enticing a minor to engage in it is very bad (even if his hormones are in favor of it) and should be punished severely.</p>
<p>In my opinion, there is absolutely ZERO moral difference between this situation and one in which a man engages in CONSENSUAL sex with a 14 year old girl. You can claim that the girl can get pregnant (which would be possible) but on the other hand a boy could possibly get the woman pregnant and have no rights regarding the child. </p>
<p>The typical feminist response that “When you can get pregnant, then you are entitled to an opinion” is as silly as “When you can father a child, then you are entitled to an opinion.” Why will she likely get a lesser sentence?</p>
<p>Sorry, men-women different in some ways. You can look it up.</p>
<p>I think what the mom did was GROSS< for lack of a better word. I find the double standard distuburbing.</p>
<p>There is a rumor that Karl Rove is now reading CC as well. With all what CGM says about him, he may send the secret posse to San Fran. </p>
<p>Maybe our first CC mom in real trouble. :D</p>
<p>Gross yes, but a huge crime–not so much unless the boys have some psychological damage.</p>
<p>Did I miss the part about how old the boys were? If they were 18, she’s a cool mom, a boy’s fantasy, Mrs. Robinson and all that. If they were 17, she’s a pedophile, jail + a lifetime of registering as a sex offender.</p>
<p>Uh, NO, she doesn’t read CC. She is gross!</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Looks like the boys are under 18. I also wonder how “cool” it must feel for a girl to be known as the daughter of a woman who sleeps with one’s classmates and provides drugs?</p>