<p>
</p>
<p>In the more competitive states, if it is true what people have posted here, one may not have the opportunity for more than one MOC/Senator nom so your theory would prove incorrect. Therefore the inverse of his theory, that only one nomination would prove one less qualified, would be false. </p>
<p>For the smaller states, often the MOC and Senator lists will be mirror images and, again, your theory would prove incorrect.</p>
<p>Now for middle of the pack states, you might possibly, in a few instances, be correct. However, the Academy does not look at the packages in the same manner as the MOCs, so this could bring discredit on your theory. Remember, if the Senators divide the slate and do not repeat names, states with less than 20 or so MOCs will have dual nominations. It would be relatively easy for the bottom 5 or so of each Senator list also not be the top pick for their MOC and, hence, not receive a nomination. Altogether, GoNavyXC made a statement that is more often false than true.</p>