<p>I don’t think that every student should go for the reachiest schools to which he could apply. Some should, some shouldn’t.</p>
<p>I think it is a worry if a student is choosing schools based on where he can party the heartiest.</p>
<p>But I don’t think this student’s list, which he has based on social considerations - but which includes academically VERY solid schools - necessarily means his priorities are out of order.</p>
<p>concernedclaude - if I were you, I would have that talk very specifically with him. If he chooses schools where he believes there will be a balance of good academics and good social life… will <em>he</em> <em>personally</em> be able to strike that appropriate balance? This is critical. </p>
<p>For some students, it is a good environment to be academically somewhere around the top 10% to 15% to 25% of his peers. He has identified schools where that might well be the case. At the “reach-y” schools, he won’t be. I don’t know how that would be for him. With his SAT scores (which is only one measure and not at all beloved by me, but still…) he will be more in the lower half of the pool - even if he breaks that 700-mark by a hair. Which would be the better environment for him?</p>
<p>Like NSM, I speak from personal experience, as many of us parents do. Everyone’s kids and experiences are different. We shouldn’t project that our kids’ experiences will apply to yours. But seeing these vignettes and what we’ve observed for our kids may help you sort through your concerns.</p>
<p>My S was a merit $$ student at a school not unlike the type on your kid’s list (Tulane). He was solidly in the top 10% (maybe better) of their pool. He loved the place. <em>For him</em>, it was not a Party School. He chose the honors dorm. He was in a demanding major. He did the work, struck the balance, enjoyed the place immensely socially and did well academically. Because of Katrina, he spent a term at a different - quite dissimilar - school: a top-25 New England LAC known, according to some (I can’t say myself), for grade deflation. He also did very very well there academically and enjoyed himself socially. </p>
<p>Also, because of Katrina, he had to transfer out of Tulane, as they eliminated his major. He chose a top school, very demanding. There, he is not at the top of the applicant pool. He is doing well there. BUT: there, he struggles academically in some courses. In those courses, he is holding his own; his head is above water. But it is not fun. This is a good and serious student; but, for him, the type of school the OP’s son is self-selecting was the better choice. </p>
<p>Think of it this way: in the type of school on your S’s list, if he is capable of enjoying it socially but rising above the Party Hearty trap, he does the work, he’s smart… he gets the GPA to go with that. But at the reach-y schools, it might be that he works harder than he has ever had to in the hopes that (in some classes, even if just a few) he might, maybe, eke out a B. This might not happen. But it might.</p>
<p>As to financials, I am just wondering: will you qualify for need-based aid? if so, it is true that some of the most selective schools in the country give generous need-based aid. But so do others not quite so reach-y. They also can be sources of good merit $$ (U Miami, eg). It sounds a little to me like you are approaching the financial piece as “it will all work out.” I’d rather see it addressed head on: what is the EFC? What are typical packages for that EFC at each school under consideration? Should the kid be targeting merit aid as a key element in his list-building? If so, some of the schools on the list will still work. But I wouldn’t just leave it to happenstance.</p>
<p>Best of luck. He sounds like a great student. And, as long as he keeps his head on straight, as he has in his high school years, he can do great wherever he chooses.</p>