<p>United States of America (Northern Division): 6
Confederate States of America: 3
Sparta: 300
New England Secession: 1</p>
<p>The Confederacy had Scarlett O’Hara. God help he who fights Miss Scarlett.</p>
<p>If both sides had the same amount of ammunition, then the South would have easily won because they had much, much better leadership. By the way, I suggest reading The Killer Angels by Michael Shaara if any of you are interested in this topic.</p>
<p>k well all of u want 2 act like the “union” was so good but if u were rly smart u would no that nothing ever that simple cus i dont no NETHING that would back up what u sayin</p>
<p>no dont read that book it not good</p>
<p>not to mention the austral folk have 100 dialects and cant understand everyone within their legions, which is why they shot their own general</p>
<p>@ nyjunior: Well, if you’re going to go there, if the Union had better leaders then the Union would have won.</p>
<p>Oh, wait.</p>
<p>They already did…</p>
<p>
You do realize that this makes book about ten times more attractive for reading?</p>
<p>more like less attractive</p>
<p>@ mr_chipset: TRUE! TRUE!</p>
<p>@D’yer: No, I don’t think you understood what I said. And you didn’t make sense in your post, read it over dude.</p>
<p>r u ENG cus i don’t think u read wat I said cus if u did u would see that I was sayin book not good LOL idiot</p>
<p>No…I think I understood and I said precisely what I intended to say. Keep up.</p>
<p>no Dyer I agree u didn’t understand wat he was sayin</p>
<p>Now how many of you guys would be willing to die for your votes?</p>
<p>No, D’yer, with all do respect, I never said that the Union had better leaders, I said that the Confederacy had better leaders. And the only reason (at least the major reason) the Union won was because the Confederacy began to lack ammunition, they had the heart and the wisdom though. </p>
<p>I myself support the Union though, since I live in NY and have a biased opinion. But regardless…</p>
<p>With all due respect, then YES I understood EXACTLY what you were saying.</p>
<p>no CON had lots of ammu they just lost cus historians want to say thats how it happened but no1 alive today was rly there so no1 can be sure thats wat happened</p>
<p>understood</p>
<p>That is certainly an interesting way to look at it mbz123. It is like a conspiracy theory, I always find them intriguing.</p>
<p>And D’yer Maker–I’m sorry if there is a communication problem, maybe we just both don’t understand each other…so let us just leave it at that and not have a silly altercation over this. I was just starting to like you’re beautiful writing in some of the other threads.</p>
<p>Confederacy</p>