<p>It’s a load of bias do do. Read their article about China…and read Wikipedia’s. </p>
<p>lol…Wikipedia is anti-Christian because they use BCE and CE…
Wikipedia is anti-US because the British spelling is illegal.
Wikipedia is liberal because it supports evolution and makes creationalism sound like a “joke”
Jeez…a world without these loonies would be a better world…</p>
<p>yea…why is it that rather than accepting the fact that other people have different beliefs, some people refuse to accept it and create a whole new institute so they can read just what they want to hear?</p>
<p>“Initially, Wikipedia was hosted on servers operated by Bomis, Inc., a company that also sold pornographic pictures” </p>
<p>"The result is a huge silo of recorded trivia, and perhaps the world’s largest, most distributed bureaucracy - mostly manned by a casual staff of teenagers and the unemployed. "<– lol, wow… biased view much?</p>
<p>“4. When referencing dates based on the approximate birth of Jesus, give appropriate credit for the basis of the date (B.C. or A.D.). “BCE” and “CE” are unacceptable substitutes because they deny the historical basis. See CE.” …I don’t think there are words to respond… lol</p>
<p>I like Conservapedia alot. I think its just what America needs instead of all these gaytheists around. And I’m dead tired of liberal propaganda.</p>