<p>18,500 views and some
back to the Met
now it’s big selling slogan is “get closer”
series of full length posters of close-up magnified partial famous pieces are lining the front plaza.
you could see surprisingly lively brush strokes on the hair bow of the Klimt girl this way.
but
you can not get closer to see Alexander McQueen
<a href=“http://blog.metmuseum.org/alexandermcqueen/[/url]”>http://blog.metmuseum.org/alexandermcqueen/</a>
So very popular, the Met extended showing schedule plus opening Mondays with 50bucks special admission if you hate crowd but have to have to see the show.
I wasn’t even gonna try but the line was not all that bad compare to last time I was there. so why not?
after 40 min or so half spent in dark ancient Iranian arts area roped in just for the queues where I could not read my book and was bored, half spent in front of Joan of Arc, Salome painting and Rodin galore where lights are good but rather want to look at them, we were there!</p>
<p>it was the fun house!! Disneyworld haunted mansion! Jekill & Hyde theme restaurant! Hogwarts!
only few dress mannequins are self-rotating and there is no room to go around to see the whole outfit. and dark! eery! strobe-flashy!! It is so very hard to judge craftsmanship or what is that made out of really, is it clam shells? feather? cow hide? antlers?
the droning music, Kate Moss simmering overhead… </p>
<p>the Met made beautiful catalogue, now on sale at artsy bookstore, even B&Ns
if you want to examine it in better lighting, look at the catalogue or the website. photos are better staged and fabrics are billowing and swinging around just so.</p>
<p>what I learned
- He did not make princess Kate’s dress. he was dead long before. It was his long time help and now successor’s design and made by his team. (thus wearable and walkable)
- his mum died (75) about a week before his 2010 suicide (40)
- apprenticed at traditional tailors since 16 to 18sh after quit school.
- he applied to central st.martins for the technical teaching job (he had no A level done) but accepted for MA instead because of his potential in portfolio.
his graduation show pieces are bought out on the spot by his benefactor fashinosta, who also killed herself in 2007. - yes, they are clam shells.</p>
<p>from the interview with Sarah Burton, the successor of the Alexander McQueen house.
Q. Do you think he saw himself as an artist?
A. I don’t know. Lee (Alexander’s first name) wanted to go back to art college.
He actually got into the Slade school to do art, but he always called himself a designer, not an artist.
he was a showman more than anything. Still, when you think about the way he designed, it did feel more about art.
It was never, “Oh, is that comfortable?”
It was all about the vision and the head-to-toe look of it. When you saw the models lined up, it was so clear and so direct Lee was a designer who was making a world and telling a story.
Sometimes it was on such a level that maybe the fashion audience wasn’t the right audience to tell it to, but what audience was right? That’s the problem, I think he had.
The stigma.
Is it fashion? Is it art?
But if it’s not making money, you can’t do these amazing shows.
Lee did care about the commercial side of the industry, but what most people remember are the shows.</p>
<p>and here is the designer’s last quote in the catalogue
-I find beauty in the grotesque, like most artists.
I have to force people to look at things.</p>
<p>I half wish he did gone back to art school to slow down a bit.
not necessary most art, artists are grotesque. if he wasn’t a peer of the shark-in-formaldehyde guy, he would have known. He was at the Met to check on his piece in the Anglomania (2006) show. but what he cared was this one pleat that was amiss on the mannequin, not rest of the Met’s holdings. maybe he did not have enough time to look around or couldn’t care much, I don’t know.
he was a born artist/designer who find inspiration in nature and genealogy but did poorly in school.
why is that one could never have it all? or how is that had to be fashion or art or anything?
do commercially well to make money to be able to spend money to do amazing things.
it is the common trap that had to do with why they’d keep killing themselves in one way or another.
savegely, maybe.</p>