<p>Iwant to go beyond recriminations and discuss some practical issues involved in coping with disaster of the magnitude of Katrina.</p>
<p>Many years ago, my brother and his family decided, like all good Frenchmen, to start their vacation on July 14. Like thousands upon thousands of other Parisians, we drove out of Paris; or rather, we headed toward the Porte d’Orleans, one of the main exits out of the city, and sat in traffic for well over one hour. The radio was telling us that cars were backed up for several kilometers. One woman tried to maneuver her car around others in front of her and ended up causing a chain reaction that left 6 people dead. When we got to Normandy, we were all exhausted.</p>
<p>I was thinking about this experience in relation to the evacuation of New Orleans. As Barrons has pointed out, but in relation to FEMA, if an order had come early and Katrina had bypassed NO, there would have been huge recriminations against those who had ordered draconian measures. That applies to city-level orders as well. So the danger must be real and imminent before a mandatory evacuation plan can be proclaimed with any hope of its being heeded. Before that, authorities can urge residents to leave on their own. In such scenarios, the people who evacuate first are those who have the greatest resources: those who have cars or other means of transportation, funds to tide them over, and connections elsewhere to receive them or knowledge of places where they might go. An aspect of poverty is precisely immobility, being cash-strapped, especially at the end of the month, lack of connections outside of one’s own neighborhood and lack of knowledge about possible resources that could be tapped. </p>
<p>While disaster planning called for evacuation, there does not seem to have been much thought about the end point. It’s easy to say “Get out of here.” There ought to be better answers to “And go where?” There was an account of early evacuees going to hotels and motels and quickly running out of the cash they had. While local good Samaritans anonymously paid part or all of their room bills, they had other expenses that taxed their resources. One story featured a man who’d left NO with $1600 and was down to $200. Few poor people have that much cash to spend on themselves alone.</p>
<p>With voluntary evacuation, it seems from reading Times-Picayune, the roads out of NO became clogged up very quickly (this is what brought my own experience to mind). An even more large-scale early evacuation of NO might have been difficult, if not impossible, unless means of transport beyond the city’s could be mobilized. I read somewhere that the school buses photographed sitting in water after Katrina had actually been used to ferry people to the Superdome.</p>
<p>These are just some musings about what it means to evacuate a city as large as NO.</p>