<p>I’m wondering if there’s a correlation between math iic and chem SAT scores. Could anyone who took both tests post their scores? Thanks a lot.</p>
<p>chem - 720
math ii - 710</p>
<p>chem - 750
math IIc - 760</p>
<p>chem - 800
math IIC - 790</p>
<p>That’s an interesting trend.</p>
<p>keep the data coming</p>
<p>SAT M-800
Math IIC-800
Chem-710</p>
<p>So the correlation isn’t as strong in my case… I blame it on my crappy chem teacher. Her class was really the pits.</p>
<p>The two subjects don’t overlap too much though. Maybe some simple algebra for chem but that’s about it and math iic is far from simple algebra. But, there would be a correlation because of the student probably.</p>
<p>IIC - 780
Chem - 780</p>
<p>IIc - 800
Chem-800
SAT I Math - 800</p>
<p>SAT I M 800
SAT II IIC 800
Chemistry 740</p>
<p>Hamster- I have the same excuse. Plus there is too much random stuff to memorize on the test.
mathwiz, the correlation is the type that a third factor causes these two results. A and B occur because C is present.</p>
<p>math iic 800
chem 780
best sat1 math 780</p>
<p>670 SAT I Math
800 SAT II Chem</p>
<p>outlier, probably. math in chem is very straightforward. i think what it is is that there <em>might</em> be a correlation, but no causation.</p>
<p>Chem–730
Math II–800</p>
<p>chem-800
math ii-800
math i-800</p>
<p>Chem - 800
Math IIC - 800
Physics - 800
I see a stronger correlation between IIC and physics, but not that many people take the Physics SAT II.</p>
<p>2c-760
chem-750</p>
<p>The data so far shows no correlation. r = -0.0437</p>
<p>well, actually, there are nine cases of chem scores being within 10 points of math scores.</p>
<p>i understand that the math in chem is pretty straightforward, but i want to see if people who do well at math also do well at chem.</p>
<p>The correlation in statistical jargon is called common response. The underlying variable that produces a common response between chem and math scores is most likely math/logical ability.</p>