<p>During that terrible open-
70 boat voyage, he quarreled steadily with the Bounty’s loyal
carpenter, and when they reached home Bligh had the
carpenter brought before a court-martial for disobedience
and disrespect.
There was another court-martial some years later
75 when Bligh, as captain of the Warrior, was accused of
tyrannous, oppressive, and unofficer-like behavior to
Lieutenant Frazier and that ship’s other officers. The
evidence showed that Bligh was a foul-mouthed bully,
and the court found the charges “in part proved.” Bligh
80 was reprimanded.</p>
<p>13 In Passage 2, the story about the carpenter (lines 69-73) primarily serves to
(A) illustrate one of Blighs personality traits
(B) suggest an alternative view of Blighs skills as a seaman
(C) introduce a revealing episode in maritime history
(D) provide an example of Blighs respect for military justice
(E) explain an apparent contradiction in Blighs nature </p>
<p>E seemed reasonable. Bligh brought a carpenter before a court-martial, when he himself is disrespectful, tyrannous, and deserves to be court-martialed (as he was). To me this showed a contradiction in Bligh’s nature. He’s a hypocrite.</p>
<p>A is also fairly reasonable. The court-martialing of the carpenter definitely shows how Bligh abuses his authority, revealing his tyrannous nature.</p>
<p>In these cases, How do I know which one to choose?</p>