<p>Unsure of how to respond to the other extended essays for the Chicago supplement, I created my own prompt (option 5-a last resort?).</p>
<p>Prompt: Having lost your greatest accomplishment-the sum of your lifes work- you wake up from a frenzied sleep in the midst of a forest. How are your observations framed in terms of your tragedy?</p>
<p>It is quite a depressing essay, ending with “This must be the summation of lifes walk when reaching that boulder upon its path: inherently whole yet explicitly worthless.”</p>
<p>In a complete contrast, however, my common app personal essay is very positive and optimistic, ending with “There definitely existed more challenges that I would confront in the future, but I was apprehensive no longer, for I harvested a novel mindset with which to subjugate those.”</p>
<p>Also, both essays outline an experience, one real (positive optimism of common app essay) and one created (negative depression of Chicago essay), with the natural background of a forest upon which my observations are based.</p>
<p>Should I bother to submit my Chicago essay, or should I form a response to a new, stated prompt? My issue is that, given these two polar opposites in essay theme, will the Chicago admissions person believe me to be some strange naturalist in a state of manic depression, or will that person believe I just responded well to my own prompt?</p>
<p>Would someone like to read the two essays and offer feedback? I would greatly appreciate this!</p>