<p>I can't speak about UR, but literature is vastly different from creative writing. That is likely harping on the obvious: the former is study of what has been written and the latter is the study of writing. The real nuance when you're reading and discussing material is literature focuses much more on the meaning of the work versus how it is written. Meaning can be historical or post-modern, sometimes both these days since post-modernism has lost its grip on criticism. This drives the selection of pieces; you might read Hardy for meaning and context but probably not as a model for writing. You'll find more commonality in someone like Stein or Joyce because the way it is written is so deeply intertwined with how it is written. </p>
<p>My advice to anyone who likes close reading, who wants to develop that skill, is to take some form of poetry. I also think that's the best preparation for law school because it is the closest analysis and is more similar to legal reasoning than regular criticism, which focuses less on individual words and paragraphs and more on overall intent and thrust. I can't recommend any era to study. It really depend on what attracts you. As a note, I know that Rumi, the great Sufi poet, is taught through the religious studies department. That is worth reading.</p>