Creativity- can it be taught?

<p>I know firsthand that it can be quashed- but can we nurture it in and out of the classroom despite today’s emphasize on test scores?</p>

<p>[In</a> Person: Terry Heckler, who drew Starbucks mermaid, can’t stop sketching](<a href=“http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2016240698_inpersonheckler19.html?cmpid=2628]In”>http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2016240698_inpersonheckler19.html?cmpid=2628)</p>

<p>[UW</a> professor’s curiosity lands him $500,000](<a href=“http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2016257986_genius20m.html]UW”>http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2016257986_genius20m.html)</p>

<p>[The</a> Creativity Crisis -](<a href=“http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2010/07/10/the-creativity-crisis.html]The”>http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2010/07/10/the-creativity-crisis.html)</p>

<p>When my kids were younger I coached an Odyssey of the Mind team and later became a judge. It is a creative problem solving competition for kids. When I learned the coaching techniques I found how easy it was to open the mind up to see things differently in all kinds of environments. Not everyone responded well but sometimes it just takes asking questions differently or looking at things differently and that skill can be taught.</p>

<p>I remember hearing about those, but it seems there were few in our area- virtually all in private schools. </p>

<p>I volunteer in the schools and have been looking for ways to be more effective- did you learn coaching techniques through the competition?</p>

<p>Unschooling.</p>

<p>Watch Sir Ken Robinson on TED TV. He kind of agrees with BCEagle.</p>

<p>I think even simple games like the one where the first person draws a scribble on a sheet of paper and the next person has to create a picture from it can help stimulate creativity. Or round robin story telling. Or writing with the left hand (when right handed).
They are exercises that stimulate the right side of the brain.
When I was in middle school (junior high back then) they had a regional contest for making machines–your creation could do anything and be made of anything. I don’t really think there were many limitations at all. You could work in groups or by yourself. It was SO much fun! And the creativity was wild (and very funny!)</p>

<p>emeraldkity here is the web site. [Odyssey</a> of the Mind – Home Page](<a href=“http://www.odysseyofthemind.com/]Odyssey”>http://www.odysseyofthemind.com/). There is also an off shoot from a years ago dispute [Destination</a> ImagiNation - Home Page](<a href=“http://www.idodi.org/]Destination”>http://www.idodi.org/)</p>

<p>I learned from their training, reading the all the materials and coaching the teams.</p>

<p>I wholeheartedly agree with BCEagle91. My son went to an excellent private prep school. The school at one time strongly encouraged creativity, but as the years went on and the expectations of parents, the customers, changed, so did the school. The focus shifted from developing creativity and a love of learning to one focused on test scores and the “right” type of ECs. Fortunately, my son was nearly through when the effects of these changes became apparent. </p>

<p>My daughter, six years younger than my son, was taken out of school at age 7 and unschooled until the age of 13, when she started taking classes locally. When we took her out of school, she was reading at the 9th grade level, doing math at the 6th grade level and handwriting at a
kindergarten level. I figured at the time there wasn’t a whole lot I
actually needed to teach her, so I didn’t really even try. We took her
out of school at Christmas break and when it was time for school to start in January, I didn’t want to do school at home. So Instead we decided to plant a butterfly garden in our backyard. We went to seminars on butterfly gardening and native plants. We drew up plans, set a budget and chose our plants. We planted that garden 12 years ago this spring and it is still a source of great enjoyment. </p>

<p>I continued to not teach my daughter, but let her learn by doing things
that interested and inspired her. She is a very creative person, has won
local, regional and national awards for photography,and a creative
thinker and problem-solver She graduated last spring, with District
Honors, 6th in a class of 451. And her handwriting is still pitiful!</p>

<p>What’s most interesting to me about really creative people is that they can’t NOT be creative. Like the UW professor and the Starbucks artist, they are always doing something to nurture their own creativity. So it seems to me that one of the crucial things that educators must do is to get out of the way and let kids with these particular creative talents have at it. You can’t “teach” anyone to be creative, whether its in science, music, art, or whatever. But you can a) recognize that creativey when it comes up and b) encourage it to flourish. </p>

<p>And yes, its incredibly hard to do in today’s K-12 system with its test emphasis. Kids who are creative ad talented in an academic subject, like science or English, are lucky. The schools, on some level, will recognize and maybe even reward their gifts. But God help the kid who is talented at something that is not a core academic. His/her life can be a living hell and the system can easily make that kid feel alienated, weird, dumb or like a failure.</p>

<p>Look up Gillian Lynne, Cats choreographer. </p>

<p>“Lynne’s gift for dancing was discovered by a doctor. Lynne had been underperforming at school, so her mother took her to the doctor and explained about her fidgeting and lack of focus. After hearing everything her mother said, the doctor told Lynne that he needed to talk to her mother privately for a moment. He turned on the radio and walked out. He then encouraged her mother to look at Lynne, who was dancing to the radio. The doctor noted that she was a dancer, and encouraged Lynne’s mother to take her to dance school.[2]”</p>

<p>I think a lot of creativity was lost when parents became SO involved in their kids’ lives. </p>

<p>When we moved into our neighborhood and DS1 signed up for cub scouts we were amazed at the pinewood derby car competition. The Dads had figured out the most aerodynamic designs and the cars were sooo similar it was spooky! DS1 made his own car and didn’t stand a chance.</p>

<p>A friend at church won the science fair for his kid by creating some kind of platform that could be lift a person using a lever - seriously? Who believes a 4th grader could build such a thing? </p>

<p>Senior year the kids have to make “memory books” in English IV. There are essays required, but a lot of it is scrap-booking. The appearance is 30-40 % of the grade. I know 3 moms who just had the kid create the essays and did all the photos/gluing/artwork for them. I told one of them that I didn’t think it was fair that DS1 had to compete with her scrapbooking skills. She said, “uh, they’re boys - this is a girl-project”.</p>

<p>The list continues…I think that is the real problem…parents don’t think their child’s creativity will be “good enough” so they don’t allow it.</p>

<p>Another Odyssey of the Mind and Destination Imagination parent/coach/judge here. Hands down, the best extracurricular program my kids were involved in, expecially for my son. There are so many life-long skills learned through this - brainstorming ideas, decision matrices, budgeting, … on and on. One of my co-coaches even took the decision matrix process to his job to evaluate solutions to a problem they were having.</p>

<p>I truly believe that creative thinking can be nurtured, if not taught.</p>

<p>I remember many years ago a French teacher admonishing me for answering with a non sequitur. To my mind there was a very clear connection, no non sequitur at all. Yeah, not such a linear thinker here… That box is just way too confining!</p>

<p>I am a ceramic artist, and as a supplement to my own art, I teach pottery to children. Preschoolers (age 3) and up. I much prefer to teach young artists to adults, as their creative instincts are a joy to watch. Adults are usually so fixated on the product, that they cannot enjoy the process. YMMV</p>

<p>I have three observations:</p>

<p>First- I agree with cincy gal- nurturing creativity in thinking is an important part of parenting. Parent’s can sometimes unwittingly squash creativity. They will come to my studio, post-project, and offer “suggestions” to their little artist about how to improve the art. This undermines the student in so many ways - both creatively, and with self-confidence. They reinforce lessons of “let Mommy/Daddy fix that for you”. Exactly the opposite of the lessons I have just tried to teach. In reality, there is ALWAYS somthing a parent can say that give their child posative feedback, without being patronizing.</p>

<p>Secondly, besides the Odyssey of the Mind (in my days, DI) training, I also benefited alot from volunteering (and receiving training) at D2’s Montessori school. The most important thing I picked up, and has stayed with me for all these years is this: Instead of telling the child something, just ask the child a question, and let them come to the answer themselves. For example, when they paint the gorilla purple (or whatever), I ask them to tell me about the colors they are using. It’s fun and instructive to hear how they think about colors (or shapes, etc.)</p>

<p>Lastly, I feel strongly that some undirected, completely free play-time is necessary to creative development. Much as I love to have little friends filling up my classes, I really would encourage parents to make sure there is unstructured time in each day for their children. So many kids I see have their days (way) over-scheduled, leaving no time to just “be”. I have built this into the pottery class to the extent that part of each class is devoted to “play clay” time, where they can do whatever they want with the clay.</p>

<p>I think creativity is often discouraged in situations where it would be the most beneficial. Wait, we’re trying to solve a problem here! Yeah, by staring directly at the roadblock, never looking to the right or the left, and getting thoroughly annoyed with anyone else who dares to do so! </p>

<p>Creativity can be scary, icky, unknown, and reach into unexplored depths, so yeah, it gets pushed down a lot. </p>

<p>I believe creativity can be nurtured and skills learned to help it flourish. We can form habits that allow for it and work on changing those that stifle it.</p>

<p>More thoughts, wee! I like this thread. Notice, btw, homeschooling and unschooling parents are going to town here? lol Yup. One of the things homeschooling affords is Time! A little leeway. Opportunity for freedom and stretching your wings. I’m big on healthy outlets – art, music, dance, theater, writing, sports (yes, I think many a problem is solved when the brain takes in a little fresh oxygen!). Get messy, let yourself make mistakes.</p>

<p>How’s that for random? ;-)</p>

<p>I think that creativity is inate human behavior that as others have pointed out, often gets quashed whether by parents or school or other factors. For example, how many times do people yell at kids for daydreaming, arguing they should be ‘doing something useful’? How many times do you see a kid drawing, and a parent or adult telling them “no, no sweetheart, it should be like this”. Creativity gets quashed the minute someone insists there is only 1 right way to do things or where trying (and maybe failing) is a bad thing. Kids are told not to take classes that interest them but might be difficult…basically, we are coming to a point where everything is contained in neat little boxes, and everyone is afraid to allow a kid to try something and fall flat on their tail, because ‘a failure will ruin you’. </p>

<p>Want proof of that? In the corporate world, very, very little new every gets created, the finance guys and the rest that run management see anything not directly related to ‘product’ as a waste of time (not all companies, creative, innovative companies exist, like 3M, Bose and some others, where people are encouraged to dream and are given time to do it…but most of corporate America? Run by unimaginative bean counters whose only creativity seems to be in cooking the books).</p>

<p>I don’t think creativity can be taught, but I am pretty certain it can be caught. What do I mean? There is a commonly held truth that the attitude kids have is caught, not taught, and I think it is the same with creativity. If a kid has a parent who seems to do everything in the lines, seems to think the rules are rules, who insists the kids always toe the line, do you think that kid is going to learn what it means to be creative, at least easily? If a kid sees a parent who always does things one way, and if the kid suggests trying something a different way and the parent’s first reaction is ‘that will never work, forget it’, what does that show the kid? Richard Feynman, one of the most creative people this earth ever produced, writes a lot about his growing up (to be taken with a grain of salt, Feynman was also a master story creator) and he talks about how his parents in their own lives showed him it was okay to do things differently and so forth.</p>

<p>One of the more interesting things I have seen out there was something called Fermimath, the school my son went to participated in it. It was really cool, because the kids had to not only think, but extrapolate, an answer to the problem, rather then grinding through standard problems. For example, one year’s question was if every ship on every ocean was drydocked, how much would the world’s ocean levels fall? It required a methodology to extrapolate how many ships there are in the world, what their average displacement is, and then figure out how much the total displacement would affect the world’s oceans…there obviously is no right answer. Another year, they had students, from a picture, try and calculate the cubic volume of the olympic torch at the Torino winter olympics…and the teams had to present their assumptions, their logic, models they used, and so forth as part of the process. </p>

<p>My theory as a parent? If the kid wants to try something, let them, in a way they want to do it (assuming it is safe for life, limb, pets, houseplants, etc…:), let them work out their own path and only help them when asked, or by suggesting things but not telling them ‘do this’. I think a big part of it is realizing that often valuable things are not so apparently valuable, I can still remember a child where the kid asked if they could try a musical instrument, the parent said “no, because you will never be good at it”…first of all, how did she know that? And secondly, maybe, just maybe, exploring the instrument and maybe not being good at it still could have benefits…A classic case of this something that came out of an interview. The interviewer was talking to the father of Leonard Bernstein (composer/conductor/creator of the music for West Side story, music educator/pianist) and he asked the father why he refused to support his son’s efforts to study music. His response is telling “Who knew he would become Leonard Bernstein”…exactly, though the irony of the words were probably lost on the parent, that that is the reason TO support creativity, that you never know…</p>

<p>melbert - my DS and DD would have loved your pottery class!</p>

<p>I remember when my DD was doing something with genetics (dominant and recessive traits) in ~7th grade. For homework, they had to draw animals that demonstrated the various inheritance patterns. All the other kids drew dogs and cats, while my daughter drew funny monsters with eyeballs on stalks from the tops of their heads, etc. Teacher actually loved it!</p>

<p>Well, I think one of the big problems is that schools are all about conformity- and the standards, if I think about it too hard, are mostly arbitrary. Maybe based on our culture and its needs, but not individualized. Who says kids should sit nicely a their desks, eat lunch at a certain time, learn in a certain order, etc? </p>

<p>But, when my kids were young, when we visited a school that gave great freedoms in pre-k, k, and first, I was the one who asked about the 3R’s. What turned me around was a 9 year old girl who was brilliant and a fabulous artist- the sort reading college level fantasy instead of practicing her cursive. She was labeled with anything the teachers could come up with. She was not liked by most of her peers, because she was “different.”</p>

<p>I’ve also, this past year, gotten to know several homeschoolers (really un-schoolers) who supremely impressed me with their intelligence, education, ability to take on challenges, creativity- and their flexibility and willingness to revisit their work in new ways. </p>

<p>I do think creativity can be taught- but it involves a radical breakdown of the conformity that pervades. Un-labeling. We teach our toddlers to put the dolls in one basket and the trucks in another. To take a nap when we want them to. I even think that “creativity challenges” are limited to the skills and flexibility of the teachers and mentors involved. There’s pseudo creativity. </p>

<p>Why do our socks need to match?<br>
Of course, we need order. And, of course, we need to learn to play by the rules to succeed as adults. Sorry if all this sounds off the wall. No, maybe even off-the wall is a delightful concept. Or?</p>

<p>I think creativity can be encouraged rather than taught. I think many schools do squash creativity but a few of mine were involved with summer programs that really ignited their creativity (writing, drama, computer programming, painting, drawing). </p>

<p>One of mine was involved in OM and my dc was extremely creative but the parents were so controlling. Really annoying to see the parents take over 1/2 of the project. I don’t even think they would acknowledge they did it. The goal is to foster creativity but once the parents involved understand there is scoring involved and it is a competition it is very difficult for them to hang back. (IMHO, YMMV)</p>