<p>I’ve gone through a rapid increase from 500’s to a low 700 using crazybandit’s simple strategy. I actually started studying for the ACT before CR because I thought CR would be impossible, and now I regret studying for the entire ACT when I could have zoned in on only CR (my math and writing are decent, just need some brushing up)</p>
<p>Anyone else improve rather quickly? I did like 6 BB tests (no QAS), and improved from 600 to 730’s</p>
<p>Maybe BB tests are not as good as QAS?</p>
<p>Is there a link to crazybandit’s simple strategy? I don’t think I have ever read it.</p>
<p>oh. I’m not sure if it’s his. It’s pretty well known I guess, but I learned it from him. </p>
<p>Basically, you give yourself unlimited time and you read the passage many times and analyze each question slowly to the point where you are confident in your answer. Then you gradually speed up/</p>
<p>Even the biggest idiotic lout in the world would be able to score 700+ in CR, given unlimited time.</p>
<p>no…^
i noe i cant</p>
<p>Salzahrah, upon interpreting your ungrammatical statement, we were permeated with trepidation and befuddlement. We believe the difficulty in the SAT Critical Reading division is not comprehension, but the minuscule time limit to perfect our solutions.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, we know the reason to your belated and erring understanding of the SAT Critical Reading. Judging by your use of “know”, we have construed the following facts to be indubitably “factual”
: 1. Thou art a foreigner
2. Thou’s native language wereth not the supreme English, but some sort of foreignese
3. Thou is not familiar with the keys which form the keyboard
4. Thou has little access to technological computers themselves</p>
<p>For those reasons above, we have meticulously explicated your SAT Critical Reading fiasco; We therefore repudiate my sentence-length statement located three posts down the ingenious threadstarter RAlec114. We request a modification into “Even the biggest idiotic lout in the world would be able to score 700+ in CR, given unlimited time and unforeign descent.” </p>
<p>-Lucifer L. Lied</p>
<p>You’re the same as always lucifer, even though I barely knew you on BM. You should stick to what was it called… satanism. You were pretty good at that :D</p>
<p>back on topic: more opinions please.</p>
<p>^ Maybe you were a very, very skillful reader when you got a 500; perhaps you didn’t know the secret tips + shortcuts to the SAT. Perhaps you fell for the distractors. Perhaps you were very gullible before, when you were given four deceptive choices. I know a friend who was very similar to you. Even the scores.</p>
<p>You know my scores? </p>
<p>I don’t give myself excuses for my low CR score. I’ve taken it 3 times without preparation and both were 500’s. (steady increase, 3rd time was 590 lol)</p>
<p>yea. I’ve seen them somewhere in CC. (uh oh, possible stalking ?!)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I agree. 10char</p>
<p>Rallec114, did you change your approach to any particular kinds of questions after you started using this method? (like how you look at inference questions, general questions, etc?)</p>
<p>^^^^^^ BM = BasilMarket?
^^^^^^^ Lol, malapropism.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>WOAH! He’s the same LuciferLied?</p>
<p>HOLY COW. It IS LuciferLied from Basil. Wow, what a small world - even on the Internet. Remember me?</p>
<p>How did find out that
?</p>
<p>What the frick? You were all on basilmarket also? </p>
<p>LOL who were you guys? that was such a long time ago. and yes it IS the same lucifer, I talked to him</p>
<p>I was OnFiRe… semi famous ■■■■■/spammer for some time.</p>
<p>^^ satanism</p>
<p>^ Hey Onfire. I think you should know me according to my CC SN.</p>
<p>Lol. Freaking Asians with their MapleStory and college admissions.</p>
<p>Holy cow no wonder why you’re name was familiar. you were part of those new wave basilers when I quit. bandit? I think? w.e…</p>
<p>do you know me from bm? I spammed/■■■■■■■ chat island lol. in one summer</p>
<p>^ Lol yep Chat Island. I’ll PM you my BM SN.</p>