<p>Another poster upstream commented on different learning styles and how some students are kinetic learners and therefore the poster opined that schools that rely “80%” on the audition have an appropriate role in this process. Another commented on how getting a lousy grade in a particular subject may reflect simply that the subject is not one for which the student has aptitude or it may not mesh with the student’s learning style. I agree with all of this. I think, however, that soozie makes the point well when she states that high school students desiring to pursue a BFA in MT need to “realize the importance of always achieving as best to their ability as possible in school”. </p>
<p>The skills and work ethic resulting from that mindset are critical to success in a college BFA program and regardless of whether the school is one that weights auditions 80% and sets the academic threshold for admission low or whether the school is one where audition and academics are weighted 50/50 and the academic standards for admission are high, he school is going to look for indicia that a student is capable of handling the demands of the program. It is always important in the application process to match the academic criteria for admission with a student’s academic record and in this regard, as I suggested above, it is not necessary to be an all AP/3.8 unweighted GPA student to find an appropriate, excellent MT program and be successful in it. Regardless of which end of the spectrum a school falls at, however, the common denominator is that all well regarded BFA programs are going to require students to work themselves to the bone and if you don’t have the skills and work ethic to do that, you will not fair well.</p>
<p>In addition, even schools that historically have been known to de-emphasize academics in their curriculum are reflecting a shift in their educational philosophy. A comment was made about BOCO in this regard and how there is more of an emphasis now on gen ed requirements. My daughter’s school, UArts, is one which historically has given greater weight to the audition than to academics and the academic thresholds for admission are lower than what you would find at a school like NYU. At UArts, however, MT students must take 8 liberal arts classes and don’t think for a minute that classes like theatre history (4 semesters) and script analysis don’t require a ton of reading and paper writing. (In fact, my daughter has a summer reading list of about 8 books for one of her fall L.A. classes and the professor has made it clear that if students don’t read them over the summer, they will be hard pressed to complete the other classwork during the semester while still attending to all of the responsibilities of their performance classes). The point is, this is college; even if it is a conservatory style program it is in the context of a college setting and the demands and expectations as a degree granting institution are not going to be the same as found at a stand alone studio program.</p>
<p>In addition, the degree of competitiveness to get into a BFA program goes beyond the audition. My daughter was one of those “all AP/honors classes, 3.9 unweighted GPA, high SAT score” h.s. students and she chose UArts to attend from among several respectable BFA and BA schools. She is not unique. The number of high academic achievers we know in the MT program at UArts is disproportionate to its reputation academically as an “arts university”. High academic achievement does not go unnoticed even at schools that don’t emphasize academics as much as others and it certainly impacts on scholarship opportunities regardless of the school.</p>