<p>Do you cyclists out there oppose the Shimano monopoly by purchasing bike components from the smaller manufacturers like SRAM? Do you believe Shimano’s dominance is an inherent problem for consumers? Is this Microsoft vs. Netscape et al all over again?</p>
<p>I recently replaced my rear sprocket. I needed a lower low gear to compensate for aging body. New Shimano replaced old Shimano. I didn’t know it was an issue.</p>
<p>My road bike, a Bianchi, is Campy all the way. Shimano makes fine components at a reasonable price, though. My commuter bike is Shimano. I’ve not tried SRAM but from what I hear, it’s a good gruppo.</p>
<p>Shimano was a bit player in the bike boom of the early '70’s but has hung in there with a good product.</p>
<p>My choice of Campagnolo was based on the lack of a broad offering of compact gearing (not young anymore and didn’t want a triple road crank) from Shimano and the fact that their brake hoods are more comfortable for me.</p>
<p>Today, either brand, even at the less expensive levels, offers a level of quality and reliability that TdF riders of the '60’s and early '70’s would have killed for.</p>
<p>Good riding to all,
Bill</p>
<p>Spent too many hours in ToysRUs - thought the big “S” in bicycles was Schwinn.</p>
<p>Thanks KYDad. As someone whose knees are also “aged,” I’ll take a look at Campagnolo.</p>