<p>
</p>
<p>Until Jym started up with her snide comments, my posts were relevant as I was citing from my experience with attorneys how one part of that non-disclosure clause would have been challenged as it would have been considered too unreasonable and hard for most people to abide by. </p>
<p>It’s one thing to state no details of a settlement agreement is to be divulged. It’s another to ask parties to avoid mentioning the case has settled at all because that would imply an existence of a settlement agreement. Language which was clear in this case’s settlement terms as released in court record. </p>
<p>That part is a bit unusual from a logical standpoint as I agree with other posters that most immediate family members and friends would know whether one was involved in a lawsuit and settlement negotiations. </p>
<p>In any event, this is more of a discussion many future attorneys, clients, and law related forums are likely to be having to avoid being put into the situation the Snays ended up in…even if the father bears the lion’s share of the responsibility for violating such terms since he agreed to abide by them. </p>