<p>Anyone remember what they put for the graph shifting question? I think it was an absolute value function.</p>
<p>@prizerebel975 No…passage 2 gives a scientific rationale for passage 1. Also, the author of passage 1 would feel vindicated.
I’m fairly certain.</p>
<p>@zfrosting the graph shifted one down. Original function was [f(x) = -|x|+1], an upside-down V.</p>
<p>@prizerebel975, no. The answer was that passage 2 supports the claims of passage 1. Vindication was in the answer.</p>
<p>What were the other choices of the refuting?</p>
<p>Passage 1 was an opinion of early birds given by a night owl. The author claimed that there must be some inherent difference in the two, because she couldn’t wake up early and still function. Passage 2 was a scientific explanation of Circadian rhythms that explains why some people are more prone to wake earlier than others, and why others are more productive later in the day. Yes, vindicated can mean to exact revenge, but it can also mean to justify, as it is used in this sense.</p>
<p>For the Math section with a grid in questions.
It was like question 3 or 4 and I put the answer as a yp/8 or something.
Do you guys remember this question?
What was the answer for this?</p>
<p>It was the average output of the factory per hour right? The answer was np/8 I believe</p>
<p>Yes! U have the same answer as me.
Lets just hope that our answer is right.</p>
<p>np/8.
xy-1 was one of them right? It seemed obvious so I was pretty concerned.</p>
<p>Edit: oh and there was one where it gave you the area of a triangle and the base of the triangle in between two parallel lines. I put 3, 5, or 6… I can’t remember which.</p>
<p>Oh and on the same math section, there was this multiple choice question about the absolute inequalities and we had to find the smallest value.
What was the answer for that?</p>
<p>@Saelanares You are correct! and I dont remember that question sorry…</p>
<p>@speedlimit it was 3, [f(x) = 2|x - 3| + 1] -3=<x=<2 or something.</p>
<p>There was another inequality question… it was 1/3 =< x (whatever variable) =< 2
I think the upper limit was two.</p>
<p>grid in with
m=x/3
m+x>200
what is smallest integer value of m
its 51</p>
<p>@thenerdyjew
I don’t remember if I bubbled 51 or 204…hmm…</p>
<p>I have a concern regarding the pot and pan fill in question. While it was similar to some of the questions I have seen previously, the thing that threw me of was that it said EQUAL amounts were being put into both pots. By that logic, they both had the same amount, it just took up more space in 1 rather than the other. Because of this, my answer was 1/2. Why? because it was essentially gonna be 1/4 * 2, because both amounts in the 2 pots were the same. I don’t think I misread it because I looked over it once or twice at least. Did u guys find out which math section was experimental?</p>
<p>@apunia it said that all of the dough or whatever was poured into the smaller pot, which was the 1/3 because the same amount of dough (you can say there is 1 unit of dough) takes up more space in a smaller pot (so you can say that there are 3 units of space in one pot, and 4 in the other). So all the dough goes into the 1/3 pot, making it 2/3 full. That was not experimental.</p>
<p>So i guess i misread…</p>
<p>1L pan - so the first pan would have 1/3 L of batter [amt of batter = 1/3 vol. of pan]
same amount of batter for the second pan but this time the 1/3L = 1/4 of the pan
4/3 L pan - 1/3 L of batter
take the 1/3L from the 4/3 pan and put it in #1, then you have 2/3L of batter in 1L so it’s 2/3</p>
<p>Also, I put capture for the scene question. In context, the litany of facts were not sufficient to capture the aurora, meaning that they were kind of ineffable</p>
<p>The answer was definitely diminish.</p>