<p>@Saelanares, that was the other option I had it narrowed down to. I didn’t feel it was motivation though, I thought it was the emotion he had for the flower. I completely unsure though.</p>
<p>@musicislife it was a “play on words referencing a phrase used earlier in the paragraph” - the shift in tone started at the top of the second paragraph, the play on words was near the end. (or was it third paragraph? I’m not sure)</p>
<p>That’s what I thought, but there seemed to still be some debate over it. Thanks.</p>
<p>could we talk about photography passage i thought it was really hard. </p>
<p>did anyone get</p>
<p>untenable
approval </p>
<p>for two of their answers?
also, for the primary purpose of the passage, was it to defend something?? i don’t exactly remember the questions…</p>
<p>@byahn1129, it was untenable, i don’t know about approval. Do you remember the question?</p>
<p>For the primary purpose of the passage I think i put the significance of something instead of the describing a genre through 1 person, because there were many people invovled and it was discussing the political consequences of it</p>
<p>It was a play on words, I think some of you guys might be over thinking it. I mean every part of the answer choice was supported by something in the paragraph.</p>
<p>It was a play on words. Specifically, a double entendre, which is considered to be a play on words
[Double</a> entendre Synonyms, Double entendre Antonyms | Thesaurus.com](<a href=“DOUBLE+ENTENDRE]DOUBLE Synonyms & Antonyms | Thesaurus.com”>DOUBLE+ENTENDRE Synonyms & Antonyms | Thesaurus.com)
What the nerdyjew was referencing to were puns</p>
<p>@byahn Untenable and approval both sound familiar. They were both quotes. One was about how photography should be an objective document, I don’t remember the other.</p>
<p>His laziness and love for pleasure played no substantial impact on her his dad’s future. </p>
<p>Also: I think it was inquisitive and skeptical; the mom was skeptical about what the child knew about art, the father was curious as to what the boy thought about the art piece</p>
<p>Also didn’t the second nature passage shift from hopeful to dissapointed? He was hopeful he would have the same experience or something, but was dissapointed when nothing happened</p>
<p>I answered hopeful to disappointed; I think the correct answer was serious to humorous. Specifically, the play on words signaled that it was not disappointed.</p>
<p>@fishingforgold it was “loving and supporting” or something of that nature. The mom “laughingly said” and the dad “smiled” or something.</p>
<p>Yes teeheelol, I agree with you.</p>
<p>It was disappointment. He said something at the end about a waste of his time.</p>
<p>Was it? I really want it to be that, haha.</p>
<p>Well the mom also “protested” against her father’s statement, almost ridiculing the child’s abilities.</p>
<p>No it was a playful response</p>
<p>The parents were joking around, from what I remember. It was like</p>
<br>
<br>
<p>It’s about right. The father even kisses the young boy.</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure the author was male, and the answer is loving and affectionate, the dad picked the boy up, kissed him and hugged him and stuff. makes more sense than cares about future.</p>
<p>Yes that answer.</p>