<p>So did we reach a consensus about what the purpose of the photography passage was?</p>
<p>On a side note, what would you guys predict this score to be: -2 wrong CR, -1 math MC -1 Grid in, -1 writing (11 essay)</p>
<p>CR could be 800, but likely 780. Math will be 760, 800 Writing.</p>
<p>Did anyone get this Q: 4x+5y+10z=3
what is x+y+z?
i know the answer is .55, I’m just wondering if the section was experimental</p>
<p>No CR -2 is almost always 800
<a href=“http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-Released-Test-Curves.pdf[/url]”>http://www.erikthered.com/tutor/SAT-Released-Test-Curves.pdf</a></p>
<p>Nope I didn’t get that question</p>
<p>@withtheflow what was were answer choices for the purpose of the photography passage?</p>
<p>How hard would you say this test is? I took the oct. SAT and the math and CR on this onis harder, and I would say writing is just the same.</p>
<p>oh wait I remember I put the photography was talking about a specific genre through an individual</p>
<p>This is my first time, but compared to practice tests, the math was harder because I had to guess and check for 2 problems…</p>
<p>Two of the reading sections were all right; the one that was super hard was the documentary photos section
Writing was medium.</p>
<p>CRITICAL READING:</p>
<p>did you guys get</p>
<p>reactionary
direct quote for the “objective” painting</p>
<p>WRITING:</p>
<p>guys waht was #28 for writing
i remember marking an error for that and ive never gotten below a 780 on writing before…</p>
<h1>28 was no error.</h1>
<p>I thought this test was fairly easy.</p>
<p>do you remember what the question was by any chance?</p>
<p>Um… was it about a banjo? I know that one of the other no answers was in dispute because people said that “draw on” is wrong. (but it’s not)
BTW isn’t this supposed to be people discussing CR.</p>
<p>where does it say that?
and did anyone get the same answers i did for CR:</p>
<p>reactionary
direct quote for the “objective” painting</p>
<p>@kevin3239 i got an error for 28</p>
<p>yeah there was an error right?
the reason im doubting the people who say no error is because if you dont read carefully, you think there is no error and you mark it, and they probably have no clue whether it had an error or not…</p>
<p>anyone remember the one about Rita?
Was it In ____<strong><em>, Rita’s story…(A)
or In _</em></strong>_____, Rita tells…(B)</p>
<p>and btw banjo was 19…
so i dont know if i can trust you either lol no offense</p>
<p>@kevin I put #28 no error but can’t remember the question. #19 banjo was also no error.</p>
<p>I put reactionary but everyone says it was objective? Reactionary was choice A right?</p>
<p>@megan
im pretty sure its reactionary because it means opposing change…
the photographer given does not want change, because if anyone bothered to read the few lines before all it talked about was changing the view of the topic</p>
<p>and i dont remember having objective as an answer choice…
it was either unprecedented or reactionary, and it was reactionary</p>
<p>i remember having 19 and 24 as no error but i dont know why 28 would be a no error i usually dont get any wrong in the finding error section of writing</p>